User talk:Carpenter0

Hi, feel free to write to me. I am new (Jan 2008) but learning.

Pukeko
I see that you have created an article for Pukeko (Porphyrio melanotus), however the article already exists, at Purple Swamphen. A redirect already exists for people searching for the bird using the New Zealand name for the species, and there shouldn't be a duplicate article, especially one that is a near orphan. I am proposing turning Pukeko (Porphyrio melanotus) into a redirect for the main article since we don't have duplicate articles, and Purple Swamphen is the internationally established name for the species. I suggest editing Purple Swamphen in future. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  03:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Pukeko responce I think it deserves its own page named with its full scientific name. I realise now it is actually a subspecies. I intend to write much more in the near future. Carpenter0 (talk) 12:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Pukeko (Porphyrio melanotus)
I have reverted your edits to the above talk page. You should not delete old discussions on talk pages, even if they are your own comments, otherwise it makes it difficult to follow old conversations. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  23:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nandu 1.jpg
Hi Carpenter0!

We thank you for uploading Image:Nandu 1.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Steatoda capensis
A tag has been placed on Steatoda capensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Photo uploads
Hello Carpenter0 - thank you for uploading your nice pictures to Wikipedia. Can we ask you to instead upload them to Commons instead? Commons is the recommended repository for all free non-text content of Wikipedia. There, the images can also be sorted better. So it would be great if you could consider uploading there from now on. Any questions, please don't hesitate. Cheers and happy editing. Ingolfson (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * For example, Commons has a category for Omana Regional Park that at least one of your images could be added to. Here there are very few image categories, which makes them hard to find even on this project. Richard001 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Auckland meetup
We're having a meetup next Saturday if you're interested. Richard001 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Omana great view.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Omana great view.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Archilles point white.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Archilles point concretions.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Broken concretion.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Cliff face.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Closeup greywacke.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Pukeko side veiw.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pukeko side veiw.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗ plicit  04:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)