User talk:Carriearchdale/Archives/2014/March

Books & Bytes, Issue 4
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014 News for February from your Wikipedia Library. Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey there
I am glad to see that you are sticking around, and that you are learning the jargon etcetera. Cheers,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  04:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * ty, mr.choppers,

As opposed to the current belief of many of wikipedia's crankier users and editors, I truly have been around the block of wikipedia. In fact since 2007, when I first registered my account here, I have been here all along. A lot of wikipedia's crankier users and editors are operating under the false assumption that I apparently registered my account in november of 2007, and then never opened a browser window to look around wikipedia until this often quoted "first edit" that occurred a couple months ago. I will just leave all the details of my life as a wikipedian to swirl around in their imaginations. It is the same difference after all, since most of the crap posted by some of the crankier users and editors could be classified as works in the "hopeful fiction genre!"

Kudos to you mr.choppers for not being in the group of the crankier users and editors. Thanks for note...

Laissez les bons temps rouler. . . . and happy mardi gras to you!

ciao!

Carriearchdale (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN3#User:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz_reported_by_User:Carriearchdale_.28Result:_no_vio.29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents
 * the above warning to this page was in response to placing a simple required template on the users page regarding an edit warring discussion that he was involved in.


 * this warning was placed on his HW talk page (placed here for clarity since hw keeps reverting warnings to him placed by other editors.

"personal attack warning[edit source]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Regarding using an edit summary to personally attack an editor

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz&action=history

"(go somewhere else (preferably off-wiki) if you're going to keep up your caterwauling)"

cat·er·waul

ˈkatərˌwôl/ verb

gerund or present participle: caterwauling

1.(of a cat) make a shrill howling or wailing noise.

"the caterwauling of a pair of bobcats" synonyms: howl, wail, bawl, cry, yell, scream, screech, yowl,ululate More"

_________________________________________-

this is the final warning I placed on aother users page - placed here for clarity since user keeps reverting the warnings so as to believe they never occurred

"You may keep reverting warning notices placed in good faith on this talk page, but that does not mean you were not warned. This is your final warning against personal attacks against an editor:

from the history

(diff | hist). . User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz‎; 10:53. . (-628)‎ . . ‎Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)‎(rmv caterwauling; Undid revision 598127011 by Carriearchdale (talk)) (diff | hist). . User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz‎; 10:51. . (-244)‎ . . ‎Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)‎(remove caterwauling; Undid revision 598127250 by Carriearchdale (talk)) (diff | hist). . User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz‎; 10:50. . (+244)‎ . . ‎Carriearchdale (talk | contribs)‎(→‎personal attack warning) (diff | hist). . User talk:DragonflySixtyseven‎; 10:48. . (+512)‎ . . ‎Ezhiki (talk | contribs)‎ (Kostino) (diff | hist). . User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz‎; 10:48. . (+628)‎ . . ‎Carriearchdale (talk | contribs)‎(→‎personal attack warning: new section)

cat·er·waul

ˈkatərˌwôl/ verb

gerund or present participle: caterwauling

1.(of a cat) make a shrill howling or wailing noise.

"the caterwauling of a pair of bobcats" synonyms: howl, wail, bawl, cry, yell, scream, screech, yowl,ululate More

_________

This notice was placed on the same users page (of course he has already reverted it - copied here for clarity)

This is your last warning. The next time you

make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.

Thanks for the heads up
No problem with the tags, it will still need a bit of work. Wee Curry Monster talk 20:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

one of my favorite well written wikipedia quotes
rebuttal I agree with your concern about the burn out on editing. I do not agree that comments on ANI pages should exclude new editors. I also do not agree that that I have significant disregard for BLP. I have done exactly two edits in Ronan Farrow page (the biography is about Ronan, BTW, not Woody), the first edit was supported by an administrator on the BLP page as appropriate, and the second was to precisely respond to an experienced editors request. I have gotten ZERO feedback on any BLP violations except ad-hominem attacks. I am primarily a medical editor who is trying to learn the skills of controversial editing in an area with less importance (and zero importance to me, but I intend to see it through to its logical end, which could be as simple as an experienced editor with a calm voice saying: "bob, do X", which I will instantly). My position is well researched and your accusation is unfounded. As for my returning the favor to Carrie of reading the record and commenting, as we had previously tried to work together in another article. We have some established good faith, with exists broadly within Wikipedia editors, so can hardly be considered bad. I have read the transcript, and gave my opinion. You have chosen to attack the messenger with no assumption of good faith. I assume your good faith in wanting a good encyclopedia, but perhaps you might want to listen and see if there is a good argument being made by Carrie or I, and dispute the content on the basis of balance rather than assumptions. I doubt that you will find two more earnest editors than Carrie or I on Wikipedia, and if you want to attract more earnest editors Wikipedia should find ways to engage each of us on content rather than false accusation, misrepresentation, POV, or what you think our intent is. Wikipedia will die if it cannot find new voices and chooses to descend into a vacuous testosterone pit.Bob the goodwin (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronn Torossian
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronn Torossian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Selalu Terdepan Studio album by Audy Item 2010.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Selalu Terdepan Studio album by Audy Item 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Nugent
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ted Nugent. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Samsung Gear Fit
Hi,

Thanks for the talk message. I didn't actually create the article however; I had created it as a redirect to the Samsung Gear page, which was later turned into an article by another editor.

I'm more than ready to help improve the content, regardless.

--RaviC (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Wideo.co article
Hey Carriearchdale, not sure if this is appropriate location for a response as I'm still getting used to the communications side of this, but thanks for the message re the Wideo.co entry! I intend to spend some more time improving the article tomorrow so will certainly take your suggestions on board and will probably be in touch for further assistance!

Thanks, Will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillDalton (talk • contribs) 00:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Great, please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help in any way on the article.

ciao!

Carriearchdale (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suicide of Phoebe Prince
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide of Phoebe Prince. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
— This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pablo Casals
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pablo Casals. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Luis Guillermo Solís
Thanks for reviewing the Luis Guillermo Solís page a couple weeks ago. I appreciate you taking the time to look at it and review it! Mvblair (talk) 10:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Simon Collins
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simon Collins. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Post-nominals
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Post-nominals. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

newer
rebuttal I agree with your concern about the burn out on editing. I do not agree that comments on ANI pages should exclude new editors. I also do not agree that that I have significant disregard for BLP. I have done exactly two edits in Ronan Farrow page (the biography is about Ronan, BTW, not Woody), the first edit was supported by an administrator on the BLP page as appropriate, and the second was to precisely respond to an experienced editors request. I have gotten ZERO feedback on any BLP violations except ad-hominem attacks. I am primarily a medical editor who is trying to learn the skills of controversial editing in an area with less importance (and zero importance to me, but I intend to see it through to its logical end, which could be as simple as an experienced editor with a calm voice saying: "bob, do X", which I will instantly). My position is well researched and your accusation is unfounded. As for my returning the favor to Carrie of reading the record and commenting, as we had previously tried to work together in another article. We have some established good faith, with exists broadly within Wikipedia editors, so can hardly be considered bad. I have read the transcript, and gave my opinion. You have chosen to attack the messenger with no assumption of good faith. I assume your good faith in wanting a good encyclopedia, but perhaps you might want to listen and see if there is a good argument being made by Carrie or I, and dispute the content on the basis of balance rather than assumptions. I doubt that you will find two more earnest editors than Carrie or I on Wikipedia, and if you want to attract more earnest editors Wikipedia should find ways to engage each of us on content rather than false accusation, misrepresentation, POV, or what you think our intent is. Wikipedia will die if it cannot find new voices and chooses to descend into a vacuous testosterone pit.Bob the goodwin (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)