User talk:Carriouyou

Image source problem with Image:Blairtindall.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Blairtindall.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 07:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bill Nye. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Nye, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 18:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bill nye t250.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill nye t250.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 04:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi! I wanted to let you know that I reverted your latest edit at Bill Nye because your previously edited version displayed a picture and your most recent version didn't. Now I understand why. Feel free to revert my reversion when you have the new image ready to use.  Regards. Susfele (talk) 01:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Blair Tindall, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Blair Tindall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, repeatedly removing cited material from the same articles without explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer  Waters  00:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Blair Tindall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 00:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Carriouyou. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 01:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Since you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia you may also respond on this talk page. De728631 (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)