User talk:Carritotito

January 2008
Your recent edit to Potrero Hills (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Boomgaylove for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- jonny - m t  17:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Kristen Bjorn
!!! I saw that and was like, good for you! The wikipedia is not censored! and then when i clicked Next, i must have clicked revert...o.O dangit! Warning removed  ✬Dillard421✬ (talk • contribs)  07:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I always try to assume good faith! :) Thats cool that you changed the infobox, when i saw you comment, i was like WTF i didnt even edit Kristian Bjørn..then i was like wait a minute...neither did he..hm..somethings wrong...LOL. If you ever need any help with anything, feel free to ask me! :) posted here too because i dont know if you are watching my talk page  ✬Dillard421✬ (talk • contribs)  07:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary.  ✬Dillard421✬ (talk • contribs)  07:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Martin Czehmester
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Martin Czehmester, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Martin Czehmester.  SilkTork  *What's YOUR point? 00:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Martin Czehmester
I have nominated Martin Czehmester, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Martin Czehmester. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  SilkTork  *YES! 23:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Gwernol 17:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)