User talk:Carsonmc

Welcome!
Hello, Carsonmc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question. Again, welcome! Runcorn 21:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mary Hood at Home.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Mary Hood at Home.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Reply to your comment on my talk page
I've removed the db-bio tag because the subject appears to qualify as notable for inclusion. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 23:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 23:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your Question

 * Where do you want to add the magnum opus distinction? Jccort (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Added Magus Opus distinction

 * All 3 you requested were added with the Magus opus distinction. Just so you know editing Wikipedia is difficult at first, but then becomes easier as time goes by. Jccort (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Mary Hood
Another editor has added the  template to the article Mary Hood, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Mary Hood
Hello. I don't think there's any chance of this article getting deleted, so I wouldn't worry about it. Sometimes the prod tag is misused, in this case it was patently ridiculous. Regards. --Michig (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TS Entrance 3.jpg
Hi Carsonmc!

We thank you for uploading Image:TS Entrance 3.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Reinhardt 1885 Administration Building.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Reinhardt 1885 Administration Building.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please fill out the "Portion used" and "Low resolution?" parameters first before removing the deletion tag. Failure to do so may result in the file's deletion. -  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 04:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks much better! Just one quick question though, when was the original photo created?  -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, that just means that you didn't even have to bother with fair use rationale in the first place. The photo was taken before 1923 and is therefore in the Public Domain.  I have adjusted the file's description page accordingly.  Regards,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Reinhardt College
You're quite welcome. I didn't answer that question, but I saw it and thought I could help. It took me ages to remember how to use the "ref name" feature myself, so I know that it can be confusing. Nyttend (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Will you get this if I comment on my own page? Yes, it's very confusing, thanks again for your help.  I need to do it to the Mary Hood page as well, unless, of course, you want to do that one too.  LOL... Cheers, thank you.Carsonmc (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I only got the message when you posted on my talk page. As you can see, when someone posts on your talk page, you get a big orange "You have new messages" banner, but if you write on your own talk page, I don't get any message at all.  If you want to reply on your talk page but you want to let me know about it, simply type  to my talk page; this will cause the orange banner to display, and it will give me a note of "You have new messages at Carsonmc's talk page".  Nyttend (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the Scouting note, too! It's always good to find another Eagle :-)  Normally you wouldn't have gotten any help from me tonight — Tuesday is the meeting night for the troop for which I'm an Assistant Scoutmaster, but the snow here in western Ohio is bad enough that it's cancelled.  And no, you don't need to start a new section with the equals signs: I get a message when any change is made to the talk page.  It's the same for you and for everyone else — there's no way to change it, thankfully.  Nyttend (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, this weather is making me remember why I love summer :-) The meteorologist on tonight's news said that we've already gotten enough snow to make this the fifth-snowiest winter on record, and more is predicted for the coming days.  I want to come to Atlanta :-)  By the way — have you yet encountered the idea of wikiprojects?  They're groups of editors that work together on various subjects.  If you'd like to put your Scouting interests to work here at Wikipedia, you could consider signing up as a member of the Scouting WikiProject. Nyttend (talk) 02:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Joining is very simple — just go to WikiProject Scouting/Members and add your username to the list. Don't worry that joining obligates you to active participation in the project; you're free to work as much or as little as you want.  And about the historic buildings — if you're interested in helping with articles related to historic preservation, you could look into the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, with which I'm quite active.  Even if you're not interested in joining this project, there's one way in which you could contribute very actively — we always need more photos of sites on the National Register of Historic Places.  You can find a list for any Georgia county by going to National Register of Historic Places listings in Georgia and clicking on the name of a county in the chart below "Current listings by county".  Thanks!  Nyttend (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Situation with the softball player is resolved. In the future, you can undo this yourself quite easily: go into the article history (for example, here) and click the "undo" button at the end of the line that describes the most recent edit.  This isn't to say "don't bother me!" but rather "it's not hard to do; here's how" :-)  Nyttend (talk) 01:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If this individual continues to do this, it will be an issue — you should warn him/her that repeated addition of nonnotables is against standard practices here at Wikipedia, and if it happens multiple times, you should treat it as vandalism. In case you've not encountered the standard warning templates, look at uw-vandalism1 and the pages to which it links below the "Part of the uw-vandalism user warning series" header.  Nyttend (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Peters House/Ivy Hall
Thanks for contributing the images - I remember eating there in the late '70s when it was The Mansion Restaurant; I was a poor starving student at Tech and a family friend took us there. Atlanta is rather underrepresented in the pictures line, so its good to see somebody's getting out and taking pictures.

The infobox image is a bit tricky, because you have to leave off the File: prefix when inserting the image into the infobox, which isn't consistent with other infobox templates, and I consistently screw it up. You can see how I inserted it,, and I think the gallery is fine.  Acroterion  (talk)  15:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ponce de Leon Apartments.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ponce de Leon Apartments.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Added license. Erroneously left off when uploaded.  My photo.  Thanks for the catch. Carsonmc (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Atlanta pix
Since you offered ... anything on National Register of Historic Places listings in Fulton County, Georgia would be great, even if it's a redlink. Some priorities:


 * Academy of Medicine (Atlanta, Georgia)
 * Baltimore Block
 * Ford Motor Company Assembly Plant (Atlanta)
 * Hurt Building
 * Martin Luther King, Jr., National Historic Site and the Auburn Avenue Historic District
 * Rhodes Memorial Hall
 * Swan House
 * The Temple

and anything else that strikes your fancy. Representative shots of historic districts are hard to do, but worthwhile.  Acroterion  (talk)  04:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Acroterion, I have pics of dozens and dozens of buildings, but only of two on the list above. I added them.  I'll go through the NR list in Fulton County and add there if I see any I have.  Carsonmc (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Added Atlanta Biltmore Hotel pics.Carsonmc (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Added Capital City Club pic and Cox Carlton Pic and brief descrip.Carsonmc (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * added Fulton County Courthouse Pic, what a building. I guess I won't tell you all I've added, but keep looking ah the NR page, I'll be adding more photos over the next few daysCarsonmc (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Georgian Terrace Hotel
I noticed your note to user Plumalley. I got the article started for you on the Georgian Terrace Hotel. I'll leave it to you to add the details. By the way, when it comes to Wikipedia's quirky footnote format, I've gotten a lot of use from the website. Canadian2006 (talk) 02:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have a reference number for the Georgian Terrace? I haven't found anything, unless it's a contributing building in a historic district.  Acroterion  (talk)  02:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * To Acroterion: If you're referring to an NRHP reference number, I don't know the number. Some sources (such as the hotel's own webpage) claim that the hotel is on the NRHP, but I question whether that is accurate. I can't find it on the National Park Service's own listing of HRHP sites. I suspect that it is merely a contributing building in a historic district.  From Canadian2006 (talk) 04:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Oops, I intended to address the question to Carsonmc, but I think you're right; I suspect it's part of the Midtown HD. The Georgian Terrace is in any case sufficiently notable on its own, and would be a major contributing building in the HD. I suspect the hotel's website isn't interested in the distinction between contributing property and individual listing.   Acroterion  (talk)  04:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Canadian2006 and Acroterion (I hope you both get this message, I cannot remember how the talk pages work with each other).

First, thank you, Canadian2006. The page looks fantastic. I'll add the history that I have. It's quite interesting. I will try to get around to it this weekend, if not by the end of next week. And the source link will come in quite handy. As I usually pull from multiple sources and then compile it into one narrative, I generally put all the cites at the bottom of the block text, e.g. Reinhardt College history.

To both of you... as far as whether the building is actually listed in and of itself or as a contributing building, I'll have to dig around for the actual fact. According to my notes, it would have been listed (in either case) in 1986. It's listing blocked local plans for demolition. I'll find out - I know being listed doesn't prevent a bldg. from being torn down, that comes, generally, from local protections, et al. In Atl. from the City and Atl. Urban Design in the form of a Landmark Bldg. So, hum...

Acroterion, I think you said you were from Atl. or went to school here, Canadian2006, were you originally form this area or have you visited? The intersection the Georgian Terrace sits on, in my opinion, is one of the finest in Atl. Stoddart's Ponce de Leon Apartments sits on one corner, The Fox Theater on the other, and, then, of course, the GA Terrace on the third corner.

Again, thanks, guys. I hope to help you all out with other bldgs. in the area. Carsonmc (talk) 08:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Regarding your query on my talk page: I tried to replicate the problem you describe, but it works fine for me. I can't explain it. Canadian2006 (talk) 04:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The article looks great, and does a fine job of documenting its notability, completely apart from any National Register listing. As a major contributing building in an HD, there would be some shielding effect against demolition. I remember the neighborhood well; there are several buildings from the '60s that are no more - the round C&S Tower at North Ave. and W. Peachtree, the white First National Bank building at Peachtree and North. The Georgian Terrace and the Fox formed the anchor to the neighborhood. I went to Tech from 1976-1980 and returned for a master's degree 1983-1985. If we can determine its NRHP status, we can adapt the infobox accordingly, as there's an option for contributing buildings.   Acroterion  (talk)  19:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the comments on the page. I loved putting it together.  I remember the C&S Tower and the First Nat. Bank, sadly, you can see its demolition on youtube.com. Have you ever been to Atlanta Time Machine.  The site has great pics of the city and of the buildings you mentioned.  As far as determining the NR district info. for the Fox area, the City of Atlanta's website mentions this: Dunagan, H. Lee. "Fox Theatre District" National Register of Historic Places, which may help us in our endeavors.  The next page I want to create is for the Rufus Rose House on Peachtree.  If I win the lottery, I'm buying it to save it.  It's in horrible condition.  See the pics of it I posted on the NR Fulton County page.  Again, thanks for all of your help. Carsonmc (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * To Carsonmc: I've sent you an email message. From Canadian2006 (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

NRHP infobox
To make the infobox (and the article skeleton) we use the Elkman NRHP Infobox Generator created by Elkman. More can be found concerning its use at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Style guide. It really simplifies the creation process, and can be used as a simple research tool to make a rough cut of listing status, as it's a digest of the NRHP database.  Acroterion  (talk)  19:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Fantastic, I'll check it out.Carsonmc (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Image deletion
To understand what's going on, you'll need to look into our non-free content criteria. Among the requirements for using a nonfree image is that its presence be essentially invaluable to the article. For this reason, it's quite okay to have an image of a nonfree book cover on the article about the book — it helps readers of the article to indentify the book in a way that nothing else can. However, book covers aren't essential to understanding an author; consequently, a nonfree book cover shouldn't be used on an article about the book's author.

One of the images is fine to keep, however — File:DSCN0250.JPG. Unlike the others, this cover isn't original enough to be copyrighted: there are no pictures, and the sole content is a little bit of text and a green background. There's no way that someone can copyright the name of a book (imagine someone getting sued for writing the title of a book and nothing more!) or of its author, and the statement about it being an award winner is likewise too short and simple to be copyrighted. Since fonts themselves can't be copyrighted, and since you can't copyright the color green, there's nothing eligible for copyright in this image. Therefore, this image doesn't fall under the nonfree content criteria, and since it will help somewhat in the author's article, there's nothing wrong with having it. Nyttend (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Nyttend for this explanation. It makes perfect sense.  I guess on a personal level, I hate seeing something deleted after it has existed, without attracting notice, for two years.  Too, humans are visually stimulated, so the more, rather than lack of, photos in an article, the more visually appealing, I think, and the more it breaks up the monotony of the text, the more we (the modern reader in this visual age) are drawn to it.  Even smaller paragraphs relaxs and tricks the mind, making the text more digestible (read Proust's In Search of Lost Time for the opposite effect)! ;-)


 * All that being said, I understand Fastily's reason for deleting the two photos. It's diligence in use - fair and justified - that make Wikipedia what it is, rather than a place for people to post anything they want.  As always, thank you both for helping me learn the Wiki-way! Carsonmc (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late response. Ah, yes, about those files, pretty much per what Nyttend said, they don't exactly satisfy WP:NFCC (Although you could upload one file instead, if applicable - see WP:NFCC).  Your contributions are greatly appreciated, so I hope this doesn't send you a message suggesting otherwise.  Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 01:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * No worries on the late response. You are very busy on here, it's totally understandable.  Not quite sure I understand the WP:NFCC message.  And, no, the possible deletion of these two photos on the Mary Hood page does not send me a message of not being appreciated.  You are just keeping Wiki well oiled and consistent. Cheers Carsonmc (talk) 03:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:NFCC just means that we shouldn't over use non-free content when one file would suffice (e.g. A user uploads 25 copyrighted screenshots of say, Halo 2 gameplay. But why use 25 files to illustrate gameplay when one single image already gets the job done?  Not only that, there are copyright concerns associated with excessive use of copyrighted content on a project who is licensed under the free CC-BY-SA 3.0 license.)  WP:NFCC also applies to Derivative Works (namely user generated collages of non-free images which all illustrate the same topic - so a collage of several images of a copyrighted statue where there is no FOP would be unacceptable).  Hope that made sense (feel free to ask me to clarify if necessary). Best wishes,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Architecture
Hello and welcome to the WikiProject Architecture - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards Elekhh (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:New Photos and question
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

STODDART
I regret to tell you that I have no knowledge/interest in architecture; nor the ability to manipulate these web pages. signed Plumalley   Plumalley (talk) 18:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)plumalley

Re:Permission Granted for use of Rufus M. Rose House
-  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:Reinhardt College Page
-  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Rufus M. Rose House 1903.jpg
Hi Carsonmc. I just received a note from MBisanz (see ). I guess the email wan't sufficiently detailed. For an email to be acceptable for OTRS, it must indicate a specific license (see WP:ICT/All for a full list of WIkipedia-compatible licenses) and the file name, which in this case is "File:Rufus M. Rose House 1903.jpg". If you don't want to go through the hassle to contact the Georgia Archives, it's fine - I understand. But if you feel the image would really benefit Wikipedia, then by all means, I encourage you to try again. All the best,  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rufus M. Rose Pic
Hey Carsonmc. I don't see anything obviously wrong with File:Rufus M. Rose Historic Photo.jpg. As far as I can tell, it looks fine as is - at any rate, it's rather unlikely another sysop would go through and delete the file. Thank you for going through the hassle to get permission for this file (despite the fact we didn't need it, as, the file is public domain) and uploading it to Wikipedia. Have a cookie for your efforts!! :) Best,  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 

Fastily has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!


 * Thanks, Fastily. The historic photo is added, and I'm pleased.  It's important to show what this house looked like as it is currently threatened due to neglect.  Who knows, maybe someone will see it in its glamour on Wiki and buy it.  Thanks for all of your help with this.  I'm sure you're tired of hearing from me.  ;-) Carsonmc (talk)

License tagging for File:TS-LOGO.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TS-LOGO.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Added license status, proper tag. Carsonmc (talk)

The thing
I am a Talk page stalker of the "Thing", so I checked it out and your fine. Your warning is also appropriate. Thanks-- Talk tome (Intelati) 21:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:RufusRoseFoyer.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RufusRoseFoyer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Damirgraffiti  ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   01:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:RufusRoseUpstairsBedRoom.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RufusRoseUpstairsBedRoom.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please do not continue to upload files missing information on their copyright status, as you did with File:RufusRoseUpstairsBedRoom.jpg. Note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and that the copyright status of all media files uploaded to Wikipedia must be verifiable by others. If you are unsure of the correct copyright template, please refer to the list of image copyright tags. If you would like to experiment with uploading files, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mary Hood at Home.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mary Hood at Home.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm on break from work, so I can't give you detailed help; however, you have a significant problem here. Unless you set up a camera on a timer and then sat down next to her, you're not the copyright holder; as long as someone else took the photo, you can't release rights to the photo.  If the photographer is happy to have rights released, you can easily prove that the license is valid by having them send a permissions email to OTRS.  I'll try to get back to you later with more details; if I forget, please remind me.  Nyttend (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:RufusRoseFirePlace.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RufusRoseFirePlace.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 Acroterion   (talk)   01:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Julia Roberts
I rolled the article back to the last accepted revision. Unfortunately the reference in your edit summary was a 404 error. Also the reference should be in the article, not in the edit summary. I would suggest editing the article to show the information you want to change with a valid reference to supporting document and you should be fine. —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 20:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TS-LOGO.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TS-LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Troutman Sanders for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troutman Sanders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Troutman Sanders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 09:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021
--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021
--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: October 2021
--evrik (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2022
--evrik (talk)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2022
--evrik (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: August 2022
--evrik (talk) August 1, 2022

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: January 2023
--evrik (talk) January 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: March 2023
--evrik (talk) March 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023
-- (talk)

Sent by using  at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024
--evrik (talk) May 22, 2024