User talk:CarterSchmelz61

Welcome!
Hello, CarterSchmelz61, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Glock have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Loafiewa (talk) 03:24, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aoi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lauren Boebert without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Kindly use edit summaries
As the comment above requests, kindly use the box below the editing window to type in an edit summary briefly describing what changes you’ve made when you edit an article. Your contribution history shows that you have not left a single such summary for anything you’ve revised. It makes it a hassle for other people interested in an article's topic to know what you’ve done without going in and scrutinizing your work change by change, and it probably increases the odds that your changes will simply be removed if it becomes too difficult for others to figure out what you’re doing. 1995hoo (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
A pattern is emerging of disruptive editing which I have seen in the Washington Commanders and Native American Guardians Association: removing sourced content from articles and adding unsourced comments, all without talk page explanations or edit summaries. Such behavior will likely lead to being blocked from future editing. WriterArtistDC (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The pages are filled with language that is biased from who originally wrote the pages. All I am doing is removing the bias. CarterSchmelz61 (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You may believe it is biased, but if you want to add new content, you must provide adequate citations to reliable sources to support what you add. Otherwise, your material will likely be removed and you are likely to be blocked from future editing. 1995hoo (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * What you are calling opinion, in the case of the Commanders article, is the result of an academic study published in a peer-reviewed article. Such studies are the opposite of bias. WriterArtistDC (talk) 18:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Faith healing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 09:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi CarterSchmelz61! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 09:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mdaniels5757. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Satanic Temple—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 20:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Satanic Temple. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Please also refrain from marking these edits as minor. This appears to be a continued issue.'' Ertal72 (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hi CarterSchmelz61! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Peanuts that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi CarterSchmelz61! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Faith healing several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 13:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

3PO
You requested a 3PO and there's no active discussion. Fell free to start one if you like, but I've removed your request since there's nothing to add. Nemov (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Aloha27. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Justin Trudeau, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Aloha27  talk  11:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)