User talk:Cartergilchrist

Bert tatham
A template has been added to the article Bert tatham, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Realkyhick 18:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bert-tatham1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Bert-tatham1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Bert Tatham
You have been silent on the above topic for a few days. The article has has some shortening and rewriting applied to it. What do you think of it? Please edit freely on the present version. I stuck the POV tag on it and would like to reach a resolution. You could help. Thanks. --Stormbay 19:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

-- I am happy with the re-writing, if you believe it has removed the POV conflict. We are working with Bert to supply a bio, and some more factual information but this is good for now. I also need to have the formal copyright process taken to use the image, that will happen when I have some time. Thanks --Cartergilchrist

Bert Tatham
Another editor has added the  template to the article Bert Tatham, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bert Tatham
I have nominated Bert Tatham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bert Tatham&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mkativerata (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)