User talk:Casablanca2000in

thank you but...
dear Casablanca2000in

Thank youf or adding categories to Rare Earths Facility. but i would like to ask if you could reconsider some of the categories you used? The facility closed in 1973, but the company that owned it did not close in 1973. The facility was never actually a company itself, but was bought by different companies, which, in turn, were bought by other companies. Thank you and i appreciate your edits and improvements very much. Decora (talk) 03:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, corrected. Detailed reply on your talk page. Casablanca2000in (talk) 04:46, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * thanks dude... keep up the good work!!!Decora (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for telling me what kind of stub the article for the Eagle font family is.  L D E J R u f f  ( see what I've contributed ) 15:27, 20 October 2009 EDT)

Thank you
I was trying to figure out the stub for mobile phones. Thank you for adding it to the Motorola Devour article. How do you figure that stuff out??? :) Hazel-roo (talk) 19:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. Casablanca2000in (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!...
for categorizing my HMCS Kamloops (K176) page! Double0three (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Tenaille
Instead of putting a template such as on a very small stub which is marked as a stub, how about instead spending your time doing a Google search on the word and adding some context? I think the place for such maintenance templates is on the talk page of an article if anywhere, as that is where editorial comments should be placed not in article space. This is even more so when the size of the comment block placed on a small stub is larger than the original article! -- PBS (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I use Template:Context very sparingly and only did so because I really couldn't make out what the article was about. I believe that any article (even a stub) should introduce the topic clearly enough that the common man can immediately understand what it is about. However, I will take your suggestion to search for some information before tagging an article next time. Casablanca2000in (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
RE:

Los Angeles Express
The trouble with the redirect that you made is that it makes no mention of the current newspaper, LA Express. Disambiguation? Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 23:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I overlooked the part about the LA Express still being published. Casablanca2000in (talk) 02:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor
As a previous volunteer at WikiProject Stubsensor I though you might like to know there is a new set available for work at WikiProject Stubsensor/20100826. Hope to see you there. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Next drive
As you are either a participant of WikiProject or the October wikification drive or have signed up to participate in the planned December drive, this probably concerns you. Discussions that have been inactive for a couple weeks regarding the December drive have been reactivated, and we would like you to participate in these discussions, and also consider joining the December drive. We have taken upon ourselves a massive workload, encompassing a backlog reaching June 2008 and comprising articles. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors, and also, please invite your friends to join! Please do not reply to this message here. Either reply here, here or here.

For the December Drive Coordinators,.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC).

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

position of stub tags
Hi, I just looked at Pheidole and found you'd stub-sorted it just before I got there, but can I point out that the stub tag goes after everything except inter-wiki links. (See WP:FOOTERS). I've moved it, but as you're a regular stub-sorted I thought I should point it out. PamD (talk) 15:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for future edits. Casablanca2000in (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited A. R. Rahman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor and Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  04:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli alumni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli alumni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli alumni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)