User talk:Casalingua

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Austin Maxi has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com ). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Citroën XM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to CAR, Independent, CX, Ford Granada, Top Gear, Rolls-Royce and Bertone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Peugeot 604
Hello Casalingua - I appreciate the prodigious amount of research you've clearly gone through for the 604 article, but I do have a few minor niggles:


 * There's a limit to how many editorial views are needed - I won't do it, but I have a feeling that chunks of this content will be deleted.
 * there is a function called, which allows you to use the same citation repeatedly. This will make for a condensed references list.
 * While the name of the journal, page number, and date will suffice, having the title of the article and the individual author named is very nice.

I have gone through and edited the various references according to accepted Wikipedia practice; feel free to copy the style I used when possible. And please don't take this negatively, I am just trying to assist (and save myself some future work). Thanks again,  ⊂&#124; Mr.choppers &#124;⊃   (talk) 06:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lancia Trevi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Citroen XM
I took the liberty of removing [|your edit to the introduction of the Citroen XM article -- saying the car was generally considered the last real Citroen. In point of fact the reference only supports that one not very notable nobody considered it the last real Citroen -- it was an egregious error to then say the car is generally considered the last real Citroen.  Thanks.[[User:842U|842U]] (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

You could have re-written it to say "considered by some". Was it Jonathan Meades who was cited? I can´t remember. Casalingua

Talkback message
--Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Last warning for spamming your blog
 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)