User talk:Casdious

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Jauerback (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your attempted split of Erection
While you're encouraged to be bold, remember not to be reckless. When considering making a substantial change that would be controversial, you should take the time to discuss first, and establish a consensus on the matter. To propose a split you can add to the page, and then add the corresponding discussion on the talk page, but in a situation like this you should wait for that discussion to play out first before going ahead with this major change TheBilly (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Erection split
Hi! I've redirected both erection (clitoral) and erection (nipple) back to their respective sections in the main article. Second thought - I might have been a hothead on this, but the sections themselves are too short to warrant their own articles, they fit nicely as sections. Waiting for your comments on this. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 18:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. You went the right way about sending messages - so no trouble here. Anyway, okay, understand your rationale perfectly as well, though - the sections on clitoral and nipple erections are just stubs, two, three sentences. Can you expand them, include the mechanics and specifics? If so, I am definitely for the split. But look for community consensus first, do not split articles yourself - this article would be in the scope of WikiProject Biology, turn to them, or do you want me to do this for you? They don't seem that active, but they are there. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 07:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The freak (comics)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article The freak (comics), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Rainbow Of Light  Talk  12:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. Go ahead and change it back if you like. You might want to say "consistency" in the edit summary to avoid getting this message again. Rainbow Of Light   Talk  12:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Evil Eyes Spawn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Evil Eyes Spawn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spawn-baterang.thumbnail.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spawn-baterang.thumbnail.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)