User talk:Cases, Special

September 2012
Hello, I'm Porterjoh. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Diana Barrows without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Porterjoh (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ross Draper with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Porterjoh (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User:Porterjoh with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Porterjoh (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Porterjoh. Porterjoh (talk) 19:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Scientizzle 19:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Do you for some reason think that you have some sort of "right" to vandalise Wikipedia five times? Another such nonsense unblock request could well lead to your talk page access being removed to prevent you from wasting more of our time. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)