User talk:CaseyHudson

February 2021
Hello, I'm Aloha27. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Neil Peart, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Aloha27  talk  12:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: transitioning. From Merriam-Webster https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transition. Transitioning is defined as a verb. Regards,  Aloha27  talk  14:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Also see https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/transition Regards  Aloha27  talk  20:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lauren London; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Aloha27  talk  20:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Aloha27  talk  01:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You do not get to remove a comment that has been replied to, and you do not get to remove my response. You created a second account, with an attack name, which was obvious from your post to the edit warring thread and you got called on it. Your new account has already been reported for a block. Meters (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

 * Edit warring and creating an account with an attack username are also reasons for this block. Any appeal will need to address all of these issues. I would strongly suggest being perfectly honest if you choose to appeal, the technical and behavioral evidence is very clear here. Just so it si clear to you, it does not matter if you were right or not from an editorial perspective, engaging in an edit war is always wrong. I would hope it is obvious that creating a second account with a name designed to harass another user is also wrong and not tolerated here. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)