User talk:CaseyPenk/Archives/2012/May

3D Tetris sources
Just a heads up. I haven't forgotten about you. I'll try to get some scans up for you tonight or tomorrow. -Thibbs (talk) 22:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

OK. Sorry that took so long. a few sources

English Japanese German For the non-English articles, remember that Polygo Block = 3D Tetris. Depending on whether you need other "small info" items like release dates and such, I might be able to find some of those for you as well. Good luck. I support any move to increase coverage of VB games. :) -Thibbs (talk) 11:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.44. March 1996.
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.45. March 1996.
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.46. March 1996.
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.47. March 1996.
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.48. March 1996.
 * - English review of the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.49. March 1996.
 * - English review score for the game from Nintendo Power #82. p.91. March 1996.
 * - English review & score of the game from GamePro. August 1996
 * - English review & score of the game from VideoGames Magazine. p.61. May 1996.
 * - English short article on 3D Tetris from the Super Express portion of Super Play #44. p.24. June 1996.
 * - English rarity listing for the game from Tips & Tricks Magazine. p.94. February 2003.
 * - Japanese blurb for Polygo Block (AKA 3D Tetris) from Famicom Tsushin (ファミコン通信) #363. December 1, 1995.
 * - Japanese blurb on 3D Tetris from Virtual Boy Memorial Guidebook (VIRTUAL BOY追悼記念ガイドブック). p.9.
 * - German genre and developer data for Polygo Block from Big N Magazine. p.19. July-August 2000.
 * - German genre, release date, developer, and difficulty from Big N Magazine p.20. July-August 2000.

Talkback
Chealer (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thanks!
You're most certainly welcome CaseyPenk, thanks for your message. As I recall, there were a few other things on that article that I maybe could have addressed or tagged, but decided to be minimal because it appeared that a page-merge or split may have been in the process. I'll make certain to return to the article by the end of my session for a quick review. Have yourself a great day, and happy editing! :) -- WikHead (talk) 03:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for using my photo.
Thank you for using my photo. And thanks for informing me. Cheers. -- Joydeep ( talk ) 16:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)