User talk:Caseyc08

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Greg Paulus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 02:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Greg Paulus has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Greg Paulus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ArglebargleIV (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Greg Paulus
You were apparently correct about his starting status. However, everything else in your edits was a pile of unreferenced juvenile name-calling and puerile obscenity. If you repeat that kind of nonsense, somebody WILL block you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 04:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Please read these pages about Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, not truth and biographies of living persons. They together explain why the text about tea-bagging will keep getting reverted from the Greg Paulus article. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 16:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. CardinalDan (talk) 01:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.