User talk:Cash888

March 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peshtigo fire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I literally cited a source. How about you like help me instead of being so strict? Admins are supposed to help people who started their editing, and yet, you admins don’t help. You’ve been on here for almost 20 years, and you still haven’t helped anyone, not only just you, but almost every admin. You did the same exact thing twice already, first removing someone’s work that is defined as a “poorly-defined scope” which no wiki admin has said, and second you did the same thing to me as well, which is entitled “Edit Wars” and if people like you keep it up, you will get blocked from editing, and I know you don’t want that. But what I am trying to say is that you need to help other editors, cause no one likes an admin who abuses their power. Cash888 (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Cash888 The administrator @DMacks simply advised you that you should cite sources more appropriately in Wikipedia. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I literally did that. And yet, he did twice with someone else, considering that person used a different source that was proper. Cash888 (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Probably the administrator thoughed it did not give evidence of what you wrote, anyway I think it is better if you clear yourself with the administrator directly, for example leaving a message in their user page. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You’re right. Cash888 (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Cash888, you wrote:
 * The wildfire remains the deadliest in the history of Wisconsin, as well it being the most catastrophic wildfire in the history of the United States.
 * The ref you cited only says it is "the state's worst natural disaster". It does not appear to say "deadliest" and it does not appear to say anything about the US overall. Could you point me to where on that webpage your specific details are documented?
 * By looking at various lists of state and US fires, I agree that it is the deadliest in the state, and I can also see that it is the deadliest in the US. But what does "worst" or "catestrophic" mean? Loss of life is bad, but some people also or instead care about property, buildings, crops, etc. So I looked at several ideas, and I see at least one that was larger in area in the US. Therefore, Peshtigo is not "worst" without qualifying what is being measured.
 * Looking carefully at the edit I made after yours, I actually left intact almost all of your addtion and its ref, as not-very-useful as I found it, and merely limiting the US claim to "deadly" rather than an undefined "worst".
 * If you think I'm edit-warring, feel free to file at the appropriate place after double-checking the refs and edits carefully. DMacks (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I looked for multiple sources that were related, but there is nothing. But you are right. I should have looked ever my edits. Cash888 (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for re-checking things! DMacks (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Wiki and Admins
Admins on Wikipedia are there to fix things up, like undoing revisions, getting rid of unsourced content, and so on. But there is the dark side of what admins will do. You see, admins that have been on Wikipedia for 15+ will have the tendency to be all strict on their new editors. For example, someone writes a sentence on an article that has to do with it and will cite a source, but an admin will step in and get rid of the sentence and will leave in response like, “Hello. I am [name]. I noticed that…” and when it comes to the sources, they will do the same thing and leave in response, “Not properly citing a source” I get that you need to cite a source, but the source that person used was proper, and they get rid of it. Number one. Number two; when it comes to blocking a person, they will either block them for vandalism or adding unsourced content, the vandalism is a good reason, but with unsourced content, that is not a reason to block them. That’s called abusing your power. Admins need to take action on helping others and not attack them. And this is my opinion, this no offense to any administrator on Wikipedia or anyone on this platform. I respect for some of the admins for actually doing their work. Cash888 (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)