User talk:Cashmedia

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kodlamane
 * added a link pointing to Puja


 * Parashurama
 * added a link pointing to Mukti

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced, promotional content
Hello, Cashmedia. Would you please stop adding unsourced and promotional content to Kodlamane. With rare exceptions, content should be derived from second or third party sources. Avoid using "peacock" terms ("beautiful" is just one of several "peacock terms" you've used). Information should be offered in a summary style, and not in the advisory, instructional or enthusiastic style of a guidebook or instruction manual. I'll have to revert your uncited and other inappropriate additions, unless you can support them with reliable, non-partisan sources. If you need help, please leave a message here (your talk-page is on my watch-list). Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a very useful introduction to referencing and sources, here. Please read it! Haploidavey (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * (moved editor's response to this talk-page from mine (per my request above. Hope that's OK, Cashmedia - this discussion was initiated on your talk, and is easier to follow on one page)


 * == correct the article but don't delete the contents ==


 * I am writing for first time. I have put efforts to convey about temple honestly, If you have better way to convey same article about temple please re-edit using the proper wording to comply Wikipedia guidelines. But don"t delete the contents, then article will be in complete. That case better to delete the whole article. I will make an official website for temple and write it thier. The article whole purpose for better mankind of globe. Temple is not commercial place so they dont need promotion or adverting, Whole purpose behind article is to guide people to make their life better. I dont want to say more than this. If you have more communication my email id is hicashmedia@gmail.com. Thanks a lot  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cashmedia (talk • contribs) 11:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response, and good to hear that you're creating a website for the temple. However, proof regarding the temple's notability and significance falls firstly upon the article's creator. Acceptable sources for notability and significance are second or third party reliable, published sources independent of the topic itself (in other words, sources which discuss and evaluate the subject of the article). I don't doubt your sincerity, but Wikipedia does not accept self-published sources or personal knowledge and assertions as a basis for article creation, or article content. "Promotion" and "advertising" aren't necessarily commercial, or exclusively secular; one can also seek to promote a non-profit idea, religious practise, utility, invention or product. Your response clearly suggests that this is what you're trying to do. Other relevant issues are your apparent personal connection with the temple (see conflict of interest), and your reliance on personal knowledge, rather than independent publications (see  Original research. If you produce a website on the temple, it can be linked from the article; but article can only be kept if conditions are met through sources independent of the website itself. Haploidavey (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)