User talk:Casiraghitrio

License tagging for Image:67746 228 600.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:67746 228 600.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Hallo
Hi, dear Casiraghis. Welcome to Wikipedia 217.233.228.110 19:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Yob Culture
I've added the "prod" template to the article Yob Culture, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Yob Culture. You may remove the dated prod template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tgheretford (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi there, no probs regarding its deletion. What you could do is edit the page and create a redirect the page to that other page you mention. It'll help other people in the future. Details on how to create a redirect is here: Redirect. Just one last thing, sign any discussion on talk pages with four tildes at the end ( ~ ) so people know who said what. And finally, as you joined recently, welcome to Wikipedia. --tgheretford (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Interlanguage links for Gråsten Palace
Hi there. In response to your post on my talk page, I found the page you need which tells you how to make the link, which is here: Interlanguage links. You'll need to know the title for the Gråsten Palace article in German Wikipedia and the two language code you need is de. The link will appear below the toolbox on the left hand side of the page. You may wish to add a link in the German article back to the English article. Regards. --tgheretford (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Athina Onassis
I noticed that you have moved the Athina Roussel article to Athina Onassis. On wikipedia if you wish to move an article you have to put it up for a vote, and then it will be moved which you did not do. Also regardless of wheather she leagally changed her name, we name articles as the person is most commonly known. There are many people on wikipedia who are not listed under their legal or married names. Please move the article back to Athina Roussel, and if you wish to have it moved open it up for a discussion. Thank-You Mac Domhnaill 00:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for moving the article back. however if you still feel it should be moved feel free to put it up for a vote. Mac Domhnaill 04:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

John Grant, Lord Huntingtower
Just a heads up you have to be careful with English and Scottish titles as they are rather different animals. A baron in Scotland is a feudal title in England it is a peerage. The Scottish equiv of the English barony title is a Lordship - Lord X never, Baron X. Lord Huntingtower is a Scottish Lordship. Also as matters of editing you shouldn't sign comments or amendments on the article itself but by all means add comments to the talk page if you feel people need to be aware of something., We also include the title, even courtesy, in the name. Alci12 16:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If you look at the page for John Grant, Lord Huntingtower you will notice that one or two of my citations (London Times) refer to him as a Baron, and also say his mother is "Baroness Huntingtower." Is it correct for an English publication to call a Scottish lord this way? No, the times is wrong. As English, Irish and British peerages use baron someone has just been careless. See Burkes where they list lordships as lord but baronies as baron. The Countess's entry -v- a British title (barony)  -v- a Scottish peer who holds both a British barony (baron stonehaven) and a scottish lordship (of Keith) .   We don't have notes on any other Scottish title to explain this leaving it to articles like Lord_of_Parliament Alci12 18:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * From 1707-1963 Scots peers elected 12 of their number (including Lordships) to sit in the House of Lords. From 63-99 they all had an automatic seat in the HoL. From 99- they can be among the 92 elected hereditary peers in the HoL. Being a representative peer is not a disqualification for standing for the Scottish parliament only the British parliament. Alci12 13:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Yob Culture
I've added the "prod" template to the article Yob Culture, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Yob Culture. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Dgies 03:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Nevermind, I just merged it into Yobbo which is basically the same subject in more detail. --Dgies 16:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Signing
Can I just ask you when you make a page, not to sign it as you have been doing. Only comments left by yourself on TalkPages should be signed. Pages you create are not 'owned' by you, and should never be signed. Thanks. --Berks105 17:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. People can see what you done and what your have added, taken away etc by the edit history. Hope this helps. --Berks105 17:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Peerage Articles
If your going to edit these articles you might find WP:PEER helpful as it gives the formats for layout. Alci12 13:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi Ineffable3000 Casiraghitrio! And welcome to the WikiProject on U.S. Supreme Court cases. It's great to have you on board!--Kchase T 20:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the welcome, but I am not Ineffable3000. I am glad to be on this WikiProject though. It's good to see such an active community of legal-information hunters. I posted this question on another talk page but haven't gotten a reply, so I will ask you, as maybe you can shed some light. What do you think about starting a WikiProject just for Civil Rights cases, like or especially for desegregation cases, a particular interest that I have? I don't know how to start WikiProjects, and I don't know that I would start one if I knew how, simply because I don't want to impose it.
 * But I hope that it might be possible somehow. I would love to see articles for all notable desegregation cases on Wikipedia someday! -- Ashley Rovira 21:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I'm getting lazy with cut and paste. Given how much the regular SCOTUS case project is sleeping, I don't think it would get much attention, but read over WikiProject and see if there are others who want to participate. WikiProject Council/Proposals would be a good litmus test of interest. I would join, but I probably wouldn't be very active. It's been months since I've written a SCOTUS case article.--Kchase T 21:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No, it's ok. I am not offended about the copy-paste error. I just thought you might have meant to leave a message on another user page. But it's cool that you took the time to one-line and correct it. Thank again, and also thanks for the tip. I will give it more thought and research before actually taking any action, though. I want to gain some more Wiki experience before I go creating projects! --Ashley Rovira 21:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Niarchos
After first reference, SN3 should be referred to as Niarchos, not Stavros; this is an encyclopaedia, not "People" or "InStyle"; please edit according to established editorial rules. Thanks.Mowens35 17:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
...for improving the EKNÜ article. --Soman 11:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Harry Potter
RHB(AWB) 21:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter

"Di Mi Nombre" - The Mixtape - uncategorized
Please don't remove   tags from articles until they have been categorized. Stub tags don't count as categorization. Eli Falk 11:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Preview
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 17:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

BRoy titles templates poll
Hi, ! I've just started a poll about Category:British royal titles templates, and would really value your input - please do have your say! Cheers, – DBD 13:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Katharine of Aragon
Hello there. Just wondering if you could give some advice on a debate on the Catherine of Aragon page regarding the spelling of her name. There is some heated discussion on the discussion page, could you drop by and add your thoughts?? CheersPaul75 01:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello, I have been reading your very nice contributions. I would like to extend you an invitation to join us at WP:TIMETRACE. What we help with is: You can read why this is important and more information at WP:TIMETRACE. You don't need to dedicate special time to this, you may for example, while editing diverse articles, check if they have sources in their history or chronology (or when they mention any important date. If they don't, you can either fix it if you have that information, or you can place inline Timefact calls where those citations to sources are missing, this will display . There are also other resources and templates you can use, just visit us to know more. We will be very glad if we can count with your help. Regards  Dao  ken  08:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Where dates or periods are mentioned that are important to the article's subject, we see that those are clear, accurate and have citations to reliable sources
 * When an article's subject should have its orgins and development described, we see that the article has a history section and that this is accurate and has reliable sources.

Possibly unfree Image:67746_228_600.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:67746_228_600.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 15:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Dining clubs
There is a one man campaign being waged against dining clubs one the grounds that they don't deserve articles. I see you've previously edited one such article, and was wondering if you'd care to lend your support at Articles_for_deletion/Dining_club ? Many thanks Grunners 18:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The Wessex Children
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, DBD 16:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Prince Carlo, Duke of Calabria
Hello, I noticed you made the article Prince Carlo, Duke of Calabria. Although he will one day be claimant to the throne of Two Sicilies, his father Prince Ferdinand, Duke of Castro although 81 years old is still alive and thus is still the pretender for that side.


 * His Royal Highness Prince Carlo of Bourbon Two Sicilies, Duke of Calabria, is the Hereditary Prince of the Royal House ofBourbon Two Sicilies. As such His Royal Highness will at some future date succeed his father, HRH The Duke of Castro as Head of the Royal House of Bourbon Two Sicilies and as Grand Master of the internationally recognised dynastic orders pertaining to the Royal House.

As far as I can see this is right? So the article on Prince Carlo should reflect that this is a future thing for him? - Animagentile (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * OK I've realised what was wrong. On the Infante Carlos, Duke of Calabria article it said "Carlos is one of two claimants to the title of Head of the Royal House of the Two Sicilies; the other claimant is Prince Carlo, Duke of Calabria." which was what I meant to say in the first message was wrong. I've now replaced "Prince Carlo" with "Prince Ferdinand" on the "Infante Carlos" article. - Animagentile (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Paul Kulikovsky
An editor has nominated Paul Kulikovsky, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue
Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in DBD 13:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I got some information
Hey Casiraghitrio... if u gave me ur email i got some interesting information about one of the casiraghi's..... mine is mark77775@gmail.com.. So email me back... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark77775 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

RFC
Please respond to the RFC on Clarence Thomas. Wallamoose and other partisan editors are trying to decimate the section on Anita Hill and the other women who accused Thomas of sexual misconduct. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Time for resolution
Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Philadelphia Poison Ring
Hello, My name is Marc Petrillo. My Great-Grandfather was Paul Petrillo. I was looking at your page and reading some of the information you had posted about the Ring my great-grandfather had done, and I just wanted to correct you on a couple things.

In total it was 114 Total people killed from the Poison Ring.

Morris Bolber is not Pauls cousin, he is a Russian immagrant that came to New York City for a fresh start. He was a teacher and opened a grocery store in NYC. Once the depression hit he then moved to Philadelphia for yet another fresh start with his family. He ended up getting boys ready for their bar mitzvahs.

My Grandfather (Armand Petrillo SR, Member of the Knights of columbus) Had just recently passed away, and we were going through his stuff and we had found books of the trials, notes, and old newspapers of his father's "Work". My Grandfather never spoke to anyone about his father and whenever we would ask we got the response, "I don't know he died when I was 11-12, stop asking me." He said it in a voice as though he knew and didn't want any of us to know. Not sure if this is relevant at all but, there are several families we are friends with the names like, Petroll, Petrill, and Petrilla. We had just recently found out from the books we found that the people who were related to Paul Petrillo were so ashamed of what he and Herman (his cousin) Were doing, that they had changed their last names so they would never be thought of as being related to them. (Herman's Family changed their last name to Petroll) In the diary that my Great-Grand Mother kept while all of this was going on had said that Temple College had actually kicked out a couple people with the last name of Petrillo so that Temple would not be associated with the Petrillo family at all.

My grandmother who had just recently told us that she knew the books were there and read some of them. She didn't know what they were till she read far enough and got scared of what would happen if the books got out to everyone. So she put them in a box and hid it so none of the kids would find it.

We had found out about this when my Grand Father died, (March 18, 2009), My Dad (Armand Petrillo JR) had asked one of his cousins if they knew anything about Armand Petrillo SR's Dad. They said "OH, You don't know?", They told him and he was shocked and didn't think it was true. He tried to find information on it and asked his mom if she knew anything and thats when we found out about the books in the attic.

Well I am sorry I wrote A LOT lol but I just wanted to let you know the information I had found out. If you would like to contact me feel free. Just send me an e-mail at xXx2fast4u90xXx@yahoo.com and I will be more than happy to respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marc Petrillo (talk • contribs) 23:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eugenie Niarchos
A tag has been placed on Eugenie Niarchos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca de Ravenel
A tag has been placed on Rebecca de Ravenel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 05:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Eugenie Niarchos
I have nominated Eugenie Niarchos, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Eugenie Niarchos. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  ttonyb (talk) 05:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniele Martinelli (journalist)
A tag has been placed on Daniele Martinelli (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Above (magazine)


The article Above (magazine) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Initially tagged for SD as no evidence of notability and unreferenced. As contested have changed to a PROD to give a chance. Currently fails WP:NOTABILITY in my opinion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

New Section
Hello!--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Rebecca de Ravenel
I have nominated Rebecca de Ravenel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Rebecca de Ravenel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  ttonyb (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Carlos Eduardo de Sousa Braga
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Carlos Eduardo de Sousa Braga. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Richard Leonard (disambiguation)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Richard Leonard (disambiguation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Richard Leonard (disambiguation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Wallis Annenberg
Good work with the article! I've written a lot on Leonore Annenberg and plan on tackling Walter Annenberg's article soon, so let me know if you need help. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'm glad you think it's a good article. I think it can be improved if only other secondary sources can be relied on. --ACRSM 20:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

John de Silva (disambiguation)
Hello. Just to let you know that this dab has been nominated for deletion using Template:db-disambig. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Best wishes, Boleyn3 (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Casiraghitrio! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Carlos Eduardo de Sousa Braga -
 * 2) Daniele Martinelli (journalist) -

Articles for deletion nomination of The Devon School
I have nominated The Devon School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Devon School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 16:00, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. User:Calmer Waters (talk) 16:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Calmer   Waters  07:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Wessex children NPOV
Hullo there. I have opened a new discussion about the styling of HRH The Earl of Wessex's children: here because their articles are currently in violation of the NPOV policy. Do please drop by and have your say (and feel free to pass on the word to other concerned parties!) DBD 21:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Julio Mario Santo Domingo, Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julio Mario Santo Domingo, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julio Mario Santo Domingo, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Attribution
This edit (2 November 2009) broke the references. Pleas e see WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT. Also removing the 1911 template was removed breaching WP:PLAGARISM guideline. I have edited the article Dukes of Luynes and restored the attribution. -- PBS (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 04:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit-a-thons at UC Riverside
The UCR Libraries are hosting three edit-a-thons focusing on their great special collections (science fiction, water resources, the Inland Empire and more) on Oct. 12, 2013, Oct. 26, 2013, and Nov. 23, 2013. Please participate if you can! Details and signup here. All are welcome, new and experienced editors alike! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Katherine Grant, 12th Countess of Dysart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Grant, 12th Countess of Dysart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Katherine Grant, 12th Countess of Dysart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

You're invited to a meetup
You are invited to join the discussion at Meetup/San Diego/April 2015. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philippe d'Albert, 13th duc de Luynes


The article Philippe d'Albert, 13th duc de Luynes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No claim to notability made, peers aren't inherently notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  17:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jean d'Albert, 12th duc de Luynes


The article Jean d'Albert, 12th duc de Luynes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No claim to notability made, peers aren't inherently notable. Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  17:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes


The article Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No claim to notability made, peers aren't inherently notable. Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  17:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Philippe d'Albert, 11th duc de Luynes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  13:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Repossi


A tag has been placed on Repossi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Majora (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to San Diego wiknic and bonfire
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/July 2017 Wiknic. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George S. Livanos


The article George S. Livanos has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic
It's the 7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic! Sunday, September 30, 11:00-4:00 PM Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90036 Hang out. Consume crowd-sourced BBQ! Bask in the glory of late September in Los Angeles (and the glory of our new user group, Wikimedians of Los Angeles). RSVP (and volunteer) here. We hope to see you there! JSFarman (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Join our Facebook group, or follow us on Twitter! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Invitation to attend a Southern California Regional mini Unconference
Who: All Wikipedians & Wikimedians

What: Southern California Regional mini Unconference.

When: Sunday 3 March 2019, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:10PM PST / 1610

Where: Philippe's at Chinatown, Los Angeles

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.

(Delivered: 00:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list & the Los Angeles mass mailing list.)

Art + Feminism 2019
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire invitation
 Meetup-San Diego-September 2K19 Who: All members of the public

What: Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire.

When: Sunday 1 September 2019, 2:00PM PDT / 1400 until 10:00PM PDT / 2200

Where: La Jolla Shores

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, and please add your intended potluck contribution to the list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject San Diego at 18:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC). You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list, and from the Southern California meet-up group by removing your name from the LA meet-ups mailing list.

Hello from a new NSF-funded legal research project!
Hi there,

I hope this message finds you well! My name is Scott, and I work with a project called SCALES, out of Northwestern University (https://scales-okn.org). We recently received a grant from the National Science Foundation to create a national resource for enabling access to court records and increasing the transparency of the justice system. Here's a paper we published recently in Science discussing the goals of our project, as well as an introductory video.

As you've contributed to the Supreme Court cases WikiProject, I wanted to reach out and inquire into how this SCALES corpus might be useful to you as an editor. We have a great deal of data and metadata about cases in the federal court system that could improve lots of stubs and B-/C-class articles (something I'm personally excited about, since in my brief teenage Wikipedia-editing heyday I was often drawn to working with stubs and new articles...) And in general, I think the SCALES platform will be a powerful tool for empowering citizens to understand the judiciary and its impact on the country, a priority I know many of us share in this topic space.

Let me know if you're interested in talking further and helping us understand how we can work with you. Thanks for your time!

All best,

Scott —Preceding undated comment added 21:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Città dell'arte Fashion: Bio Ethical Sustainable Trend


The article Città dell'arte Fashion: Bio Ethical Sustainable Trend has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline nor the more detailed Notability (products) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!
--JSFarman (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of J. Rich Leonard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Rich Leonard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/J. Rich Leonard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Snickers2686 (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)