User talk:Casliber/Archive 62

Black mamba
Do you think it is capable of getting to FA? LittleJerry (talk) 18:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. However I have discovered over time that commonly articles that have already been developed substantially can be more work than starting one from scratch. But I have a special interest in buffing this one as snake articles are often edited by young people wanting to emphasise how poisonous they are, often with unreliable sourcing. If you have a look at the history of this page you will see. Also, it was extensively edited by a sockpuppet account with lots of very puffy speech. I have gone through part of it (taxonomy and description but will recheck), but it really needs checking of the lower half of the article to ensure that the material is correctly sourced and faithful to sources. It would be a good one to do and co-nominate. Up for a challenge? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes! Though I need to get a hold of some of the sources. LittleJerry (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok let's do it Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm going to purchase some of the books used as cites. We may need to do some replacing of sources that we can't get a hold of. LittleJerry (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I had another look - I only really did taxonomy section. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I just ordered Marais' 2004 book, FitzSimons and Vivian's 1970 book and Mattison's 1987 book. I also have Håkansson and Madsen (1987) on JSTOR. That should cover a lot of cites. I'll look through JSTOR this week. LittleJerry (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

By the way, the same sockpuppet account has worked extensively on other reptile GAs, including Black-necked spitting cobra, Forest cobra, Many-banded krait, Western green mamba and Eastern green mamba. Sigh...these will all need checking at some point....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the sources I mentioned above plus the NatGeo link and Haagner and Morgan (1993). They should be all good now. You may find that a good chunk of the article cites from these as you continue your source check. I can't buy more books now, maybe you can look at the Spawls 2002 and 1995 books. I can't find mention of the brow range or parts of the fighting in my sources. LittleJerry (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * On second thought. I think I'll just do so rewriting. That way you only need to spotcheck the "Venom" and "Attacks on Humans" sections. LittleJerry (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, the sections "Description", "Distribution and habitat" and "Behaviour and ecology" should be all good as far as sourcing. I'll let you take care of the rest. LittleJerry (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright. Will take a look soon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * When do you think it'll be ready? LittleJerry (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ? LittleJerry (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have to read and get my head around the venom material. Will do soon. Been very busy. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

apologies. Have also been caught up in a quagmire of lion secondary/daughter pages. Have a look at my contribs as any opinions on the various debates I have launched might assist bringing about a consensus sooner. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I took care of some of the lion articles based on the consensuses. Do you still have plans for mamba in addition to red-bellied black snake? LittleJerry (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes I do. I felt overwhelmed by the mamba venom section. I did RBBS as it is not so poisonous so there is less hoo haa about how toxic it is. I will read the venom material very soon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I think we should nominate it now. Peer review isn't going anywhere and I was told by one of the copyeditors that it looks good. LittleJerry (talk) 01:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I see that FunkMonk has just added some queries. Let's look at them first. I am really busy for a few hours. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll list it for Copyedit. I know someone would may get to it. LittleJerry (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, red-bellied black snake was much simpler. Once that gets through it also gives a sort of template. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I think its ready, but I'm not sure if it will get many relies over the holidays. LittleJerry (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Ready now? LittleJerry (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * we need a range map. The one in it is wrong. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Got the range map. Ready? LittleJerry (talk) 16:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Great! I think just waiting till one of the other ones I am involved with is promoted, which should be a day or two. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

- it's at FAC now so we're on high alert. :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Becky Lynch as WP:FAC
Hello there! I found your name in WP:FAM and I would like you to help me nominate Becky Lynch, which would be my first FAC. I can see your have a lot of experience in this community and you are relatively active. Any kind of help or advice will be appreciated. Thanks in advance! Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I noticed worked on it to GA status. maybe ask her to have a look as well. I am not a wrestling person. I will look over it. The aim would be to ensure it is as comprehensive as possible before fully copyediting it Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Spurs
Any chance these can be filled in?

I'm really dubious about the prose quality of the article. It suffers from POV, PEACOCK and just poor quality English in places. Has it had a third party copyedit before FAC?

Really sorry to be negative. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 12:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I read over it many times, but I have not a great eye for detail at times,....but anyway...am here now...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You're great at copyediting! --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, do you think caretaker managers count as managers? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

No --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ok, it's 130am and I need to be up in 5 hours. I need to sleep. I will look more tomorrow. don't worry this is doable. Do any of your sources specify when they were first called "Spurs" (obvious I know but finding a ref for when would be good) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen any specific mention of when it was first called Spurs that I can remember (I will check again), although I have found references to Spurs as early as 1884 and 1885 e.g. (The Sportsman, 19 March 1885 ), ( (Sporting Life 28 December 1885, pg. 4 ). The 1884 one is quoted in the book by Tottenham and Edmonton Weekly Herald -  . Seemed to have been called either "the Spurs" or "the 'Spurs" in many early sources (the "the" has now been dropped).  Given that the first press mention of the club appeared in 1883, it is likely to have called Spurs very early on, if not from the very beginning. I have seen another early reference to Spurs although it is not clear if that refers to another club called Hotspur (Spurs may have been a general name for clubs named Hotspur).  Sorry for not editing because of the holiday, will get back to it later today to fix some issues (trimming the later sections and adding an extra paragraph). Hzh (talk)
 * I think adding historic mentions is a good idea for a history article! --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't remember reading it, but I'll see if I can find an actual source that states when "Spurs" was first used. If I can't find such a source, then maybe just a simple statement that it was used very early on. Hzh (talk) 20:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The book by Tottenham and Edmonton Weekly Herald has another quote of a report of a match held in November 1883 - . Hzh (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

The 89-90 season seems to be covered twice. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * That can be rewritten. It came about because different people wrote different things at different times, and I wasn't sure if combining the two parts would disrupt the narrative about the takeover of the club.  (There are a lot more about the conflicts in the boardroom that could be written, but those were omitted so that the story won't get too convoluted.) I think maybe the two parts can be partially merged. Hzh (talk) 20:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * was ferreting around looking for some sort of ref origin for nickname "Spurs" and came across this which actually has alot of historical information on the Jewish support of the club. Just pndering whether it goes better in the History article or supporters section of main particle. Also has an interesting story about Manchester City but for another day....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Australasian gannet
Casliber 00:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Cas Could you take a look at Macrozamia riedlei and the associated talk page
I can no longer understand what the problem is anymore! I have offered solutions: None of which seem to satisfy Cygnis insignis... The relevant discussions are at Commons and Talk:Macrozamia riedlei I think the discussion might benefit from your thoughts....MargaretRDonald (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Some of the AVH maps have looked a little odd in the past. With some odd inclusions and some odd omissions. At times it appears as if the data is collated by a bot. I've never used t hem to create maps but instead gone to a monograph or decisive review to see what is said there. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The maps are generated on request, using any and every data set they can access. It would neat to create these with a few clicks and an upload wizard, but I have never seen a way to do that using the filters available. Nevertheless, it not a published document and contradicts the information in our article, which took me some time to establish, and the FloraBase map (for the WA range, if I finally accept Margaret's contention there are outliers "collected in NSW" and I have no business contradicting that source). I'll attend to the DYK request tomorrow, I've spent too much time on this today and need to look at something else instead. cygnis insignis 13:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * In Macrozamia riedlei map, (as with all my maps using AVH data) I downloaded the darwin core set of variables using the download option from AVH. As can be seen there are records showing in NSW. These consist of 7 specimens collected by D.L.Jones at Shoalhaven all on the same date. See e.g. Record CANB 618160.7. As can be seen by inspecting these records, each indicates that the specimen was not cultivated. (So the field, establishmentMeans, will not exclude any of these records.) However, today I did a new download, https://doi.org/10.26197/5c2736e141e89, in which I expanded the DarwinCore variables by adding all the datachecking variables. These included: Suspected outliers and outside expert range for species.  However, when checking the 386 records which had spatial coordinates recorded, NO record failed these tests.... So the first map uploaded for Macrozamia riedlei with its Shoalhaven records is the best that one can do automatically for this species.  The Shoalhaven records must be deleted, either by hand or by special coding which effectively says: "I know the native range of these records, and therefore these must be excluded". (I will do this if that would content Cygnis insignis.)  However it is the case that all data sets come with errors and with missing values. AVH has curated these datasets and we should not indulge in further curation(=original research). I believe that I should, in future, download the DarwinCore plus the datachecking variables and use the AVH curated variables to exclude points AVH considers dubious, but as can be seen here this will not necessarily exclude points which some would like excluded.  MargaretRDonald (talk) 10:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It's a long time since I used the system but I recall a few years ago seeing some odd results. Anyway, am pleased there is some human review going on their end. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I am only able to endorse my contributions to the article, but not its current state. Another contribution, crudely inserted, has been made that contradicts the results of my own collation of current facts with a reference to 1998 entry in the national flora. The form of the plant is the best I could do with sources available, but I think I know why sources do not accord and will get around to fixing that later (when I am less pissed off). Resolving this now would be timesink, I already lost a day on the map, so I prefer that my name is removed from the DYK and I focus my efforts elsewhere. I'm hoping you can simply remove my name from the nomination, the arcane nesting of DYK pages is not something I need to know, and want to make it clear that I'm not requesting anything more than that. Note also that I am averse to DYK itself, while not without merit I find it forces my hand to make the best content possible before it is presented as an example of my contributions; that's my problem it seems so I just avoid it and focus on something more enjoyable to me. cygnis insignis 08:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Mensa and 88 modern constellations
You are probably aware that Mensa (constellation) is to appear as TFA tomorrow (congratulations). My attention has been drawn to the (formerly) quite horribly named 88 modern constellations article, which I have been WP:BOLD and moved to IAU designated constellations. I have edited the lead of Mensa accordingly: I hope you are OK with that. I am going to suggest similar change at WP:ERRORS for the extract that appears on the main page. You may wish to share an opinion there. Kevin McE (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the "short and sweet" Mensa! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are, , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

2019


Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019 -

begin it with music and memories

Thank you for your help last year, and your good Austral wishes! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Danke schon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you today for the Australian raven, - a Main page with three birds pictured, after yesterday's two cantatas ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for today's Banksia oblongifolia, and check out "Happy" once more a smile and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), - that user probably kept me on Wikipedia in 2012, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and sadly missed Sasata, today for Imperator torosus, and check out the January image in the "Happy" link, - it's where I am. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you today for Antlia, "a constellation with a few interesting tidbits"! I have a PR open, and plan a FAC shortly. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Ambassis macleayi
Please take a look at the image problem. Cheers. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 12:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. We are GTG. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 13:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Bester Bube
Hi Casliber, thank you for reviewing my DYK nomination for the above article on 10 Dec. I fixed the issues you raised on the following day, but have had no response, although I have pinged you twice since. I know you're busy doing other good work on Wikipedia, but I'd be grateful if you could confirm that you're now happy with the article. Many thanks. Bermicourt (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

History of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. FAC
I'm happy to have a look if you're short of reviewers. I've never taken an article to FA status (still trying with Cardiff City F.C.) so I'm not certain of the exact requirements of it but I'll see what I can offer. Kosack (talk) 14:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The main thing is thinking, "How specifically could this article be better?" hopping off WP as busy IRL. Back laterCas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've submitted a review of the article. As I said, I've never really participated at FA level before so feel free to disregard any issues I raised that aren't relevant or necessary. Hope that helps. Kosack (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Golden-headed cisticola
Just a note that a picture of a golden-headed cisticola has been nominated for FP status:. Sadly, the article is very much underdeveloped. It struck me as a topic that may interest you, but please feel free to ignore this if you've no time or interest! (Other images recently nominated include a new lead for scarlet myzomela, which, of course, was one of yours!) Josh Milburn (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Macrozamia riedlei
– Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Dendrobium falcorostrum
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Red-bellied black snake
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Thoughts for a blitz on the category: Taxa named by...
Hi. I was wondering how we might promote a campaign to include the categories Plants described in ..., and Taxa named by ... in all plant articles. Currently these categories are sadly deficient for most plant articles, making the categories very far from encyclopaedic. One can interrogate IPNI in the plant name search and search by author (standard name) coming up with (almost) all possible plant names for an author. It would be good if we could aspire to such completeness in Wikipedia. (it could of course, be done easily via a bot using the infobox, which would be the simplest solution.) Either way, how might it be made to happen? MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You mean with a bot or something? There are bot operators around. See Bot requests Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * or the human bots ... JarrahTree 01:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, &  MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * this can also be done by interrogating WD, Plantae+description/year and limit the data to 'has article at wikipedia'. Or just the English wikipedia, to emulate the intent of a lot of manual edits, but with more accurate results. cygnis insignis 05:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Would it be possible for you to do this? And then point me to your coding so that I might be able to imitate it in future queries. (And for the query on author). MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crater (constellation)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crater (constellation) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 15:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Berkhamsted
Quick note: Sending you many thanks for undertaking the much appreciated task of carrying out the Good Article review of the Berkhamsted article. I will try to respond as soon as I can, but I will also try not get in the way. ~ BOD ~ TALK 12:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

hi Casliber I am wondering, are you waiting for an action by me? the Berko article did get visited by a fellow editor requesting a few reasonable clarifications, all got resolved (i think, to my knowledge). (its only been a couple of weeks, maybe I am rushing unnecessarily lol) ~ BOD ~ TALK 22:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * (facepalm) oh am very sorry I forgot/got distracted and will be back there soon! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Apus as TFA...
All the usual - it's set for Today's featured article/February 17, 2019. Help Dan out if you see anything in the blurb that needs fixing. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Okies. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Ambassis macleayi
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crater (constellation)
The article Crater (constellation) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crater (constellation) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Ficus coronulata
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

FAC nom
Hi, I've gone ahead and nominated Cardiff City F.C. for another run at FAC. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look if you have the time and let me know your thoughts, thanks. Kosack (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I was wondering what took you so long! There soon....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Tidying Up with Marie Kondo
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * We had so many book donations yesterday at our UK based charity secondhand bookshop, where I work, fellow volunteers thought it was maybe partly the result of the rumour that Marie Kondo supposedly said folks should only have 30 books. ~ BOD ~ TALK 13:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh dear.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

got there at last
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles - under 10k - please it would help if you create new Australian biota articles if you could be please be so kind enough to actually put biota-importance=low  on the talk page - which is the default - so we keep the number under 10 k - it would be much appreciated if you can help with this (keeping the number down that is) - thanks... JarrahTree 08:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * wow, ok Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * no big deal - and if it seems a bit loopy - my messages to darrenhughes and cygnis insignis might be more fitting (and obscure) - nothing to worry about - I'll eventually get the unknown to 0 - but there is a bit of donald rumsfeld logic about where there is nothing - where no one knows who didnt know about put anything about biota in animal and plant talk pages :) - spooky - the trees falling in the forest and the related cia jokes of the early 70s - JarrahTree 13:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * but take care - geoff adjusted all his caladenia in one fell swoop earlier this evening (creepy to see my watchlist light up) - I dont want to say this particular mission of mine harms editors, shopping centres or gerbils, or whatever - it will all sort out - it is more the future - dont worry about the past edits, I'll get to them... JarrahTree 13:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * YES! biota tags for farm animals is a furphy in my post facto reasoning state (having tagged about 10 or so into biota) - your edit summary hits the point - I will return to them at some stage and fix that!  thanks for that JarrahTree 13:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

FAC
Hi Casliber,

I would like to request for review of my FA nomination. The article is in quite a good shape I think, but still there may be erros and areas for improvement, so your opinion and suggestions are much appreciated. Secondly, it has been on FAC for about two weeks, and I fear it may be archived if there is no further activity in next couple of weeks. Thank you  AhmadLX  ( talk ) 00:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes I'd be happy to. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

TFAs for March
Australasian gannet on the 10th, Hydnum repandum on the 24th. You know the drill.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * cool/thx. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the bird today, announced "I buffed this article in a fit of patriotic pride after northern gannet was promoted to Featured status." - I'm "buffing up" Michael Gielen for the sad reason that he died. Just noticed that I mentioned im in a DYK as early as 2010. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * thx! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Coconut lorikeet
Cause my backlog of articles isn't big enough? Sabine's Sunbird  talk  03:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yer just saying that cos it ain't a seabird or a groundbird...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My current target is very arboreal. Actually, if you're in the mood for a collaboration, I just threw a great paper into the talk page of Shining bronze cuckoo and looking around it seems well researched and you've already done the DYK for it. Sabine's Sunbird   talk  22:33, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * cool, will take a look Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Although a quick look at HBW suggests a potential four way split, so maybe not such an ideal candidate. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  23:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, need to look that up....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

hmmm
might be of interest, or not  - cheers JarrahTree 06:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Acacia shirleyi
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Dippy
As one of the all-time top 3 editors of Diplodocus, I thought you might be interested in a related article I created yesterday (Dippy (Diplodocus carnegii)) – it's considered the world's best known dinosaur skeleton, and has a fascinating story behind it. Any comments or suggestions for improvement would be greatly appreciated. Onceinawhile (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Interesting article Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
 * 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
 * Flag of the United States Library of Congress 2.svg Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
 * Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Unlock
Perhaps half a decade later this can be unlocked? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jefferson_(Philadelphia_University_%2B_Thomas_Jefferson_University)&diff=569276055&oldid=569275210

--2604:2000:E010:1100:481C:C04B:CF99:1210 (talk) 01:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * sure why not.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 2604:2000:E010:1100:481C:C04B:CF99:1210 (talk) 02:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Project Plants articles rating
Hi Casliber, Could I please ask you to have a look at the quality rating of Mairia, Corymbium, Roridula, Phaneroglossa, and Felicia filifolia. Thank you in advance! Greetings, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 11:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

FAC advice?
Hi Casliber! Do you like tennis? Regardless, I was interested in promoting Kim Clijsters to FA status and wanted to know what you thought of the current state of the article. I have re-written the entire article and am currently waiting for it to be reviewed for GA status. Though, I was considering skipping that step and instead putting it up for peer review or jumping straight to FAC. Do you think it is ready for an FAC? Thank you! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll review it for GAN Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

History of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the History of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 14, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/April 14, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * maybe they'll be buoyed by their main page appearance and win the Champions' League Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Absolutely. Pity Real Madrid have gone, since we beat them in the qualifiers... Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Re: Semi-Protected edit request on 3/5/19 for the article Bipolar disorder to include a link for Ronald Braunstein
Hello Dr. Casliber : Just a quick note to update you about a Semi-Protected edit request which has been posted on the talk page for the article Bipolar disorder. Perhaps if you have spare time you might share your medical expertise and extensive experience as a Wikipedia Administrator in order to evaluate the proposal to incorporate the following text at the end of the section entitled Society and Culture
 * '''In an effort to ease the social stigma associated with bipolar disorder, the orchestra conductor Ronald Braunstein cofounded the

'''ME/2 Orchestra with his wife Caroline Whiddon in 2011. Braunstein was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 1985 and his concerts with the ME/2 Orchestra were conceived in order to create a welcoming performance environment for his musical colleagues, while also raising public awareness about mental illness.'''

The can be no doubt that your expert opinion would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks in advance for your thoughtful consideration and best wishes for your continued success on Wikipedia. Respectfully yours, 104.207.219.150 (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)PS
 * Ok adding it now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Red-collared lorikeet
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK help
Hi. As per this revision of Bandaru Dattatreya, the article has 922 characters. I expanded the article and currently the article has 4832 characters (well above the 5x threshold of 4610 charatcer). However, the DYK tool shows "Article has not been created or expanded 5x or promoted to Good Article within the past 10 days". Can you please have a look into this matter and help me understand where I have gone wrong? Thanks in advance. RRD (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * unfortunately it seems it needs a 922 char article to be expanded to 5x 1500. Something like that? MPS1992 (talk) 05:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * No. I do not think so. I expanded Mausam Noor from 1100 characters to 6500+ characters and promoted to DYK. Firhad Hakim was also expanded from around 600 characters. Same for Muhammad Kam Bakhsh. During these, the DYK tool did not display such a message. RRD (talk) 05:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * You could read Did you know. Also, why do you describe an election that occurred in 1996 as "upcoming"? Are you re-living those years through music, as some westerners do? MPS1992 (talk) 07:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Without checking further: sometimes the tool looks at an earlier version, which may have been longer, but was perhaps deleted as copyvio. - You also can nominate and xplain as above. We reviewers look at the thing, not the tool, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The word count has expanded 5-fold. The characters are just shy of 5-fold. If you can add a sentence or two it would get it safe. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks! As per your suggestion, I have added a sub-section about his image. RRD (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Great! It is fine now sizewise Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Coconut lorikeet
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Mairia hirsuta or Mairia purpurata
Hi Casliber, I have just created Mairia hirsuta, but this seems to be a later synonym of Cineraria purpurata. Perhaps I could ask you to have a look at the Taxonomy section. The new combination Mairia purpurata does not seem to be widely used. Did I make the right choice here to create this article, or should I have created Mairia purpurata? Should I create a redirect for M. purpurata even if it is not (yet) well known? Thank you for your advice. Kind regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Interesting. Looks like Mairia purpurata has not gained traction yet. I'd leave at hirsuta until accepted. Yes I'd make a redirect. In fact I just did :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Canvassing on Rigel talkpage
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Arianewiki1 (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Replied there. These editors are nonpartisan and would not hesitate to offer a different opinion to mine. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I am preparing the WP:ANI now. Thanks. Arianewiki1 (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for the black mamba, an article with a checquered history, saying "I also feel it is important to get articles that kids like to stick superlative facts in (eagles, most poisonous snakes, supergiant stars) at a "stable version" type level to deal with future arguments."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Pink-necked green pigeon
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Thomas Crisp scheduled for TFA
Since you nominated this...

This is to let you know that the Thomas Crisp article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 18, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/April 28, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  07:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Newberry
If you have the time to give it another look, I've nominated Newberry Volcano at FAC.  ceran  thor 21:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

I've been a world champion now for 11 years straight
Biographies of living persons/Contest --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I believe you are the last person to fix an unreferenced BLP. Guettarda (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Oh dear. No wonder there's always so much work at CAT:BLPPROD --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned!
 * Hehehe....I was mistaking Terry Butcher for Mark Butcher before I clicked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Gloeocantharellus purpurascens
Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Red Irish lord at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Cortinarius violaceus scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Cortinarius violaceus has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 22 May 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/May 22, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Black stork scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that black stork has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 28 May 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/May 28, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 23:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's a co-nom again! Ealdgyth - Talk 23:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eastern brown snake
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eastern brown snake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Opabinia regalis -- Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you are a current participant in round 2 of this year's WikiCup! There are only a few days until the second round ends – if you haven't made you first submission for this round yet, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 05:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Cretoxyrhina FAC
Hello,

I a posting to inform you that the Cretoxyrhina article has been renominated for FAC, which you helped review. Because the second FAC seems to be dragging out due to the absence of reviewers, I am posting on this talk page to let you know in hopes that you may be able to re-review the FAC.

<font style="font-family: Mistral"><font color="#0000">Macrophyseter  &#124; <font style="font-family: Consolas"><font color="#0000">talk   07:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for what you did for the Black stork! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

The WikiCup
As a WikiCup judge, I have removed your submission of Eastern brown snake as a GA from the Round 2 submissions because the GAR was completed on 30 April. Please submit it again after the new round starts, when it will get you off to a flying start! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ok will do Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eastern brown snake
The article Eastern brown snake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eastern brown snake for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Opabinia regalis -- Opabinia regalis (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, I don't know if you noticed or not, but my very first FA Cardiff City F.C. got across the line last week. Just wanted to say thanks for your help with the GA and FA reviews of the article. It wouldn't have made it if you hadn't encouraged me in the GA review nearly two years ago! Thanks again. Kosack (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Heh, no worries it was well deserved...now for the next one....heheheCas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, and  Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
 * Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular"> <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Green mamba
Do you need the books to add more information or just to make sure the text is cited properly? I can do that. LittleJerry (talk) 00:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The latter would be fine. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I think I'll help you out with the article, but you'll have to take the drivers seat. Do you need me to use the sources I have to replace some the cites that you don't have? LittleJerry (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That would be great as I have on way of checking otherwise in case someone asks Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have access to any of the other books? LittleJerry (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Only what I can find on google books Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Well I don't think I can replace all of them. LittleJerry (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No I figured you mightn't - just check what you can and we can figure what to do next Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll try to get to it this coming week. LittleJerry (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, there are a few things in my personal life that will hopefully get resolved next week. I hope theirs no rush. LittleJerry (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No its all fine. Take your time Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Did some source replacing. FitzSimons (1970) and Marias (2004) support their texts expect partially for the first lines of "description". I'm assuming Sprawls supports the rest. This is probably the most I can do. I may do more FAs but I find higher taxa more interesting. LittleJerry (talk) 03:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's fine. It's good you like higher taxa. I find it hard to get enthusiastic about them. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I recommend that you get "Field Guide to East African Reptiles as use it as your main book source (maybe replace some of the ones you don't have). You can purchase it on google books. LittleJerry (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Resident fun guy
Hi Cas, looking through WLE 2019 images and found this it too small to go far but since you're into fungi I thought you might find it interesting any way Gnangarra 07:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * noice...bit hard to tell what it is though...but noice Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Malayopython
Hi Casliber: great that you started this page!! Had this on mind too since I revised the list a few months ago. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , yes after looking at the literature it is so obvious that it is surprising n-one has done it. Bit ITIS appears to be dragging its feet.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:54, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Red Irish lord
Cas Liber, you last posted that you were going to do some edits to the article based on the DYK review. I can see that you did some that same day, but nothing since, and haven't posted to the DYK nomination page since then. Are you still interested in pursuing this nomination? If so, please post to the nomination page; it's been over a month. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Red Irish lord
Hello! Your submission of Red Irish lord at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Cleopatra will be on Wiki's main page as today's featured article for June 1 !!!
Mark Antony to Cleopatra VII Philopator: "dude, if I die, you can have my entire Megadeth collection."

Cleopatra: "but dude, we're already dead!"

Antony: "Oh. Well then they're yours, dude."

Hehe. ;) Thanks for the support! Pericles of Athens  Talk 13:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Crater (constellation)
TFA for June 29. Also note that black mamba was successful for June 5. Cheers,--Wehwalt (talk) 19:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Red Irish lord
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

you have moil
JarrahTree 12:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Peer review
Hi, I currently have Fred Keenor at peer review with an eye to taking a run at FA. This is the second peer review I have listed but neither have garnered any responses yet. I was wondering if you would be able to have a look if you have the time. Feel free to skim and make it as light as you like, I'm happy to iron out any real issues at FA but it would be nice to know I'm not missing anything stupidly obvious. Cheers. Kosack (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)