User talk:CasperCasey/sandbox

COMMENT
Nice research, CasperCasey. Now the challenge is to edit for a more neutral tone. For example, lines like "QAnon spreads ‘biased’ [and] ‘misleading’ information, ‘to promote [and] publicize’ Donald Trump and the conservative agenda" as a statement are problematic. If this were a direct quote from a reliable source. Also, the article already, presumably, has laid out what propaganda is, so adding the Oxford definition here works more as a preamble for what is sounding more like an argument than presenting the facts as best we have them. That is actually one of the more challenging things to do is work toward definitions and descriptions that are as neutral as possible. It seems you have plenty of material. All you need to do is work to edit it in a fashion that is Wikipedia-appropriate.--Jbdolphin (talk) 07:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Awesome job! Your information is very informative and well written. Everything sounds clear and concise. I agree with the professor above, that some things can be more neutral. It is hard to stay neutral when things seem clearly implied, but try your best to stick with facts straight from your source. But, I learned a lot from what you wrote. I did not know what QAnon was before, and now I have a good grasp on what it is. Again, awesome work! -Karly

Great Job!
This is a great amount of research and should be much appreciated by anyone who reads it! It is very much informative, excellent in flow, and also ties to your topic nicely. I think there are a couple issues with neutrality that have been pointed out above, however you are very much on the right track! I feel so excited to see your edit in its final form! I believe this subject material that you have proposed to add, is so valuable! Keep up the good work! -Dcaxew -Dcaxew (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Ideas for Refining Edits
You have a lot of great material here, but it needs to be distilled down into what is important to add to the Propaganda through Social Media article. I think the opening you have is in adding a section under "Social Media" on imageboards that references their efficacy for conspiracy theories such as Qanon.