User talk:Casperxavier

November 2014
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to North Wales child abuse scandal. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at North Wales child abuse scandal. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:17, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at North Wales child abuse scandal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at North Wales child abuse scandal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: North Wales child abuse scandal was changed by Casperxavier (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882588 on 2014-11-30T14:46:35+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for your comment, but you should really try to learn how best to contribute here. Firstly, please read this article about using reliable sources, and this about how to add citations to articles. Secondly, as a general point, if any of your edits are reverted or changed by other editors, you should discuss the matter on the article talk page, to reach a consensus with other editors - and you should definitely not take part in edit warring. Finally - a more minor point - if you leave comments on other editors' talk pages, please sign them using four of these: ~  That will automatically give your signature, and the time you made the edit. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Casperxavier said:

Thank you. I have never ever used Wikipedia before, never ever never, so you can imagine this is very intimidating as I did it in good faith. Then I am accused of edit warring and if I ever vandalise Wikipedia again, it's all very hardball stuff in my humble opinion !!!!! - Nothing could be further from the truth. Anyway, you're obviously seriously into it all, rules and all, so I wish you well. I have no hard ~ feelings, but initially I did wonder what planet you were from. However, the actual topic is one that I am very concerned about and the truthfulness of the matter etc. Thank you for the guidance and your reply Ghmyrtle ! Casperxavier (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)