User talk:CassCass3997/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

Evaluating "Psychological Evaluation" 1. In the begining the definition of psychological evaluation simple states "other domains" what are the other domains? This must be answered. 2. Much of the wording is good; however, phrases such as: It is the mental equivalent of a physical examination" have a good concept, but I am sure that there is an article somewhere that can be referenced to give a better descriptive sentense. The idea is good, yet it needs to be fleshed out. 3. The article is not written to the highest of quality much of the article seems to be opinion based and is lacking in references to back up the opinion. 4. There is a content gap on the definition: are there other purposes to pyschological evalution, what are the "other domains" that they are referencing, what would be an appropriate way to feel or behave, and what is the psychological evaluation truely relate too? 5. The content is not laid out in the best of ways, the History section needs to be ordered in chronological order and in geographic location order. Bouncing around between time and location confuses the reader and it makes the article difficult to follow. 6. There is a lot of content gaps in the history. Although the ideas are good they are not flushed out. Saying that there are a variety of tests and then not describing what the tests are is not helpful at all. 7. I would suggest putting more detail into the ideas and concepts given in the article. Many sentences provide information about the topic without going in depth leads the reader hanging and does not give the article the depth it deserves. 8. I would suggest adding more needed references. There are only 14 references and many of the references are clustered in certain areas. The article needs to be more well rounded and citations need to be throughout the entire article.