User talk:CassInKC

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mitch Holthus. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --   Luke      (Talk)   23:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC) -- Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
 *  ! ATTENTION !  -- This is your second warning today (9/21/11) about removing sections from the Mitch Holthus Wikipedia article. If you remove an entire section you must provide a reason why in your edit summary or else it will be treated as vandalism and reverted. Continued vandalism could lead to your being blocked from all editing rights. It is also considered common courtesy to discuss such a wholesale change with others on the Mitch Holthus discussion page. I saw no justifiable reason for your removal of relevant and properly referenced personal life information. If you are new to Wikipedia and this was a "good faith" error due to inexperience PLEASE use the Sandbox for test editing or consult the Help:Contents section. Thank you. Sector001 (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.


 * !! PLEASE STOP !! -- Despite previous warnings you continue to remove pertinent and verified, referenced information from the Mitch Holthus Wikipedia article. If you can provide a valid reason why it is being removed then you need to say so either here on your Discussion page or else on the Mitch Holthus discussion page. Your continued pattern of behavior is not an acceptable way to solve any problems you have with the article and places you at great jeopardy of being IP blocked. Sector001 (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)