User talk:Cassandra Davis

 Welcome

Hi ! Welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use  ~  (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use New contributors' help page. You can also type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! 21:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Larramie "Doc" Shaw
Please proofread your edits. I reverted your edit because of incorrect grammar and spelling, as well as using non-reliable sources. Asher196 (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

LaVan Davis
Your edits were reverted because you are adding unsourced information, or information that relies on Imdb, which is not a WP:RS Asher196 (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Asher196 (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi. If for some reason it wasn't clear before, if someone else took the photograph you do not get to claim it as your own work nor do you have rights to license it unless you have been granted them by whoever originated the photo. Please see Images and Licenses. If there is a question you can't find an answer to, ask. Also, what was the purpose of this edit? Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Lavandavis-naacpimageawards-5.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Asher196 (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

3rr issue
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. JForget 00:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

RE:Edit summaries
Please use edit summaries, as I have no idea why you reverted. Any evidence to the contrary? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :)  01:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Jacksonfloodof1979.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:DowntownJackson.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DowntownJackson.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Protonk (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jacksonnight.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jacksonnight.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Protonk (talk) 07:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please explain why you are removing buildings from the section by going to the article's talk page at Talk:Jackson, Mississippi and joining in the discussion there. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 21:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ''Why? Please add discussion on Jackson, Mississippi talk page.'' Jmerchant29 (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 'You have been asked to stop removing the buildings from the article and to discuss the changes on the article's talk page. Without a valid reason, you should not remove valid content. -' &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 23:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

New Orleans
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.. Please cite your sources concerning the 2003 and 2009 figure. Thank you. --Moreau36 (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Robert Skyhawk So sue me! (You'll lose) 23:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

New Orleans
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Plaese read WikiProject Cities/Guideline for city article guidelines. Thank you --Moreau36 (talk) 21:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Reblocked
Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 2 weeks. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time. Infrogmation (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Please make use of your time out to review Welcome and related pages. Also, please review your image uploads and make sure source, authorship, and licensing is accurate. Deliberate upload of images with false information is considered vandalism. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

New Orleans
You modified the demographics resulting in a formatting error, which you obviously overlooked. In the future, please check your edits before committing them.
 * —  {

Proposed deletion of I Can Do Bad All By Myself (film)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Can Do Bad All By Myself (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Future films are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Tyler Perry's House of Payne recurring cast members


The article List of Tyler Perry's House of Payne recurring cast members has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, poorly written.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Man in Question (in question)  09:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meetthebrowns.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Meetthebrowns.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meetthebrowns.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Meetthebrowns.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)