User talk:Cassianto/Archives/2019/June

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophie Dahl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House & Garden ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sophie_Dahl check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sophie_Dahl?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Frank Matcham
To any watchers, aside from those who took part at the peer review, I have just nominated the above at FAC should anyone wish to offer a review. Much thanks in advance.  Cassianto Talk  15:38, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Let's go get a beer
Cassianto, I'm sure Rob has seen it. BF is trying to bait you into misbehavior, for which you can then be reported (now, apparently, to Trust and Safety too). As someone who is occasionally subject to baiting, I vote we walk it off this time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Commented on their talk page. Reverted again, in my favour, this time by Duncan Hill. I shan't revert again, although there are rules on baiting, I'm sure. Mine's a pint.  Cassianto Talk  22:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, I am definitely not trying to "bait" Cassinato into misbehavior. That is an unfair allegation and again, showing how crazy things are getting over this affair (notwithstanding its seriousness).  I expressed my review on my Talk Page to Cassinato and we discussed it, and I told them I would not revert them again (which I would do if I was baiting). Come on. People need to power-down a bit here and stop assuming that everybody who is not on one side, is therefore de-facto on the other.  That is not right.  Not at all. Britishfinance (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I have secret evidence that proves I’m right about your motivations. Unfortunately, I can’t share it with you or anyone else on WP, so you won’t be able to show me I’m wrong. Trust me.  You’ll be able to revert someone’s talk page posts without me thinking it’s baiting in one year. Assuming you don’t criticize me anymore in the mean time, of course.  —Floquenbeam (talk) 13:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * . That is a dispiriting response from you; I can't imagine what information you have on me but whatever you have, let it out. Britishfinance (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I suspect Floq is just being as little "deliberately ironic" here. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would be wonderful if that solved the problem, wouldn't it? Kind of my point.  But unfortunately, I get to say "I'm not allowed to tell you because privacy", and then you just have to sit there and take it. Anyone who knows you and thinks maybe just maybe you aren't baiting Cassianto and I've misunderstood the situation is not allowed to defend you without being called a "protector of an abuser".  Which, of course, also means everyone gets to call you an abuser, based on my secret evidence.  I'd like to thank Jan for teaching me this, which will be a useful skill going forward. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * . Ah, thanks for that, you got me going there! And in fairness, your point is well made. I hope that WMF integrates the BoT (and/or ArbCom) into their "secrecy circle", which perhaps (?), would help address this issue? thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * LoL, and whoever said the Americans don't understand irony! :)  Cassianto Talk  14:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oooh, Floq. Does everyone over at WMF look like a filmstar? **swoon** Martinevans123 (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * See, this whole affair is even affecting my sense of irony, oh the humanity of it :) Britishfinance (talk) 14:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (Dropping my imaginary T&S-character for a moment): If this whole affair has led me to accuse you of baiting when you weren't baiting, I apologize. Please consider the possibility that it also led you to accuse Cass of gravedancing, when he wasn't, and that this accusation was also unfair. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I certainly return the apology to Cass. My aim was not a "policy bait", but to explain my action in the deletion. :) Britishfinance (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. Floq, thank you for injecting some much needed humour into this debate. Now, I have a date at the theatre to attend to. Best regards.  Cassianto Talk  15:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Peter Sellers scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the [Peter Sellers]] article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 24, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/July 24, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)