User talk:Cassie Swackhamer/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? Shows what the articles are lacking, and provided a few good sources for each topic.

2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? no all seem related to topics.

3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain. the articles are mostly positive information and give you a good understanding or idea of each topic.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? NO, these articles are not one-sided or trying to convince the reader to be on a certain side. & no these sources were majority from reliable sources such as Todays Dietitian and Oxford Academic.

5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? Nope just keep adding more notes and sources!

6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! We both have finger food as one of our topics, but we both do not have a lot of information so maybe we can help each other with that.

Maiya BarkerMaiyabarker (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)