User talk:Cassio.vieiraneto/sandbox

This looks pretty good, but it's late and I don't have time to read in detail. One thing I notice is that you need to add links. I will add more detailed feedback tomorrow, but this looks very good. I'm glad you took my advice to include Allport's Productive Paradoxes paper.

More feedback
Rating = 2. For the most part, this is very good work, and just about ready to publish. Otherwise it would get a 1. Just some easy fixes needed:

1. Under Reviews and Critiques, you have: "Robert Wozniak is a psychologist and the author of "Classics in the History of Psychology". In "Classics in the History of Psychology", Wozniak,[3] gave praise for "Principals of Psychology". He claimed it was “The most important text in the history of modern psychology.” He also claimed "Principals of Psychology" was “unique in the history of human thought”.[3" Actually, Wozniak is not the author of "Classics." This is a website that is full of articles and books. Wozniak just wrote the introduction/commentary on Principles, which is one of many books by different authors available on the Classics website. You need to do a proper citation.

2. Reference list is not done correctly. The fact that you have numbered references in the text indicates you did that part right. Delete your current references and use the Insert Reference List function to generate the numbered reference list.

Let me know when you've made these corrections. You should be good to go after that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Council (talk • contribs) 17:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia 10 Assignment
I think we should decide on how were splitting up the final things for this project.

Things left are

fixing the Wozniak section - completed 5-3-14

fix reference list - completed 5/3/14

Cut and paste from original stub

link to other articles (done already)

We do need to fix and update our existing article for 20 points so please comment on how you want to split up the work.

Things I had questions on are

Can you save changes to the Wikipedia page in the preview mode prior to actually publishing it ?

Do you guys think it would be easiest to do this in person and if so when are you available ? I am free tomorrow all day (unless I get called in for a work crisis). I am free Monday after 11pm and I am also free Tuesday prior to 9am and after 11pm. The 20 point update is due Wednesday May 7th and If we are allowed to publish its due May 9th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allyrmartin (talk • contribs) 19:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I will fix the reference stuff since I was the one who inserted them. We can meet on either Monday or Tuesday after 4 Cassio.vieiraneto (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC) I believe I just fixed the reference list issue. The links to other articles I think are all good too and Wozniak citation seems to be fixed as well. Only thing we have to do left is to figure out how we will put our text with the stuff that is already thereCassio.vieiraneto (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Do we know if we ask the permission to publish now with this info fixed or if we integrate our stuff with the existing article and then get permission to publish the article as a whole ? Can we start blending the articles and preview them without publishing the changes ? I was thinking I would email Dr. Council and let him know the corrections he asked for were completed and see if we can get the permission to start the next step. On Monday and Tuesday I cannot meet until after work. It would be very late (11:30pm) that I could meet. I have work until 11pm and cannot miss work. I am okay with meeting this late but need to know if this is okay with you two. Please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allyrmartin (talk • contribs) 03:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Needs a few more edits
I have done numerous minor edits, until I am tired to doing this. I put in a lot of commas to delinieate phrases. Please put Principals of Psychology in italics rather than quotes. I did this for you a lot, but pooped out toward the end. This is ready to go, almost. The major edit you need to make is to put Allport's discussion before Heffron's, in the section on criticism. Obviously, Heffron is reacting to Allport's analysis, so it doesn't make sense to have Allport following him. J.R. Council (talk) 03:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I went through the article and put Principals of Psychology in Italics. I also changed the order of paragraphs involving Heffron and Allport. Please let us know if there is anything left to edit prior to publishing approval. Cassio and Kristopher, please look through the article and make sure all principals of psychology are in italics. I think I got them all but it wouldn't hurt to have another person look through and make sure. - Ally

Time to publish!
I made a couple of minor edits. I think you are good to go now. Let me know when you publish. Nice work!J.R. Council (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)