User talk:Cassiopeia/CVUA/EN-Jungwon

Hi, Greetings, Please use this page for questions and for assignments question pls raise them in assignment sections. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

1. Is there a limit to how many reverts you should do if an editor is adding incorrect information to an article which has a reliable source that contradicts the incorrect information? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eyes_Wide_Open_(Twice_album)&curid=65557459&action=history like in this example where an ip was adding incorrect chartings for the album and did i use an appropriate template to warn the user on their talk page


 * , There is no limit of revert if the edits are deem "blatantly vandalism edits". However, if the edits are considered disruptive or other types of edits, then an editor is limited to max 3 reverts for the same article within 24 hours time frame or the editor will be "blocked" from editing - see WP:3RR - (very important). If you are blocked, you will not only not able to participate in this program, but also you will not be granted any user rights / or rejoin any program until 6 months you blocked is lifted. Do try all means to get blocked (such as participate in WP:Edit warring, personal attack other editors, make vandalism edits and others. If you are not sure the nature of the edits, then leave it and let other editors who have more experience to do the action. The example you shown above is a vandalism edit as it introduce false info against the source.(note: adding unsourced content is not a vandalism act) When you add the warning template on the editor page, you dont need to state the article name on the section and separate them 3 times like you did. If you use "Twinkle" all you have to do is click "Warm" then select the level of warning and the nature of the warning and then add the "article name" - see example here when the warning will group into "month" section. Let me know if you have any other questions. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)