User talk:Cat's Tuxedo/Archive 1

Crash Bandicoot GAN
FYI- I've placed Crash Bandicoot (character)'s GAN on hold for now. I've left comments at Talk:Crash Bandicoot (character)/GA1‎. If you have any questions, please post them there. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC))
 * Just checking in about the GAN. The changes you've made are a step in the right direction and have addressed some of issues. Today is the last day to make changes. If you have any questions, please let me know. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC))

Crash Nitro Kart GAN
Placed on hold pending further improvements. See Talk:Crash Nitro Kart/GA1 for the GA review. –MuZemike 21:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. User:Calmer Waters (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Calmer   Waters  07:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI: Crash Team Racing
I've left some minor notes on the GAN page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 22:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Crash Bandicoot (video game) GAN
I nominated the article for GAN, and I'm working on it for further improvements. Please take your time to review it at the talk page. Thanks!!Railer-man (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Crash Bandicoot (video game)
Good job on this article. If you could, though, could you opine over to the WT:VG/RS? It's in pretty desperate need of some more opinions. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Crash bandicoot sales
According to the VGChartz website all the first 5 orignal crash bandicoot games have sold well over what has been stated on the crash series wiki for example, it states crash warped has sold 3.87 million units however it has sold well over 7.2 million units worldwide can someone update them please, the psn sales have also sold approximetly 1.2 million. if any clarification is needed go on to the VGChartz website and in the info box type in the crash bandicoot games and will give you the correct sales amount —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.240.198 (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * VGChartz isn't considered a reliable source for Wikipedia because its information is unfounded and thus invalid. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

The source that is used currently for the crash bandicoot sales is the magic box, how do you know that is a valid source? that also may be unreliable, that sourced is dated in 2003 the sales have increased vastly since then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.240.197 (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless a more recent source that's actually reliable comes up, we will continue to use those figures. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Crash Bandicoot: the Wrath of Cortex
Hello On crash bandicoot: wrath of cortex’s, wiki page there is no section on `Development` of the game. There is some very interesting articles stating that Mark Cerny was going to design this game as he had designed all the original games and Sony was going to publish it, but Universal Interactive fell out with them both and travellers tales (the development team) had to go from a free roaming game to a standard Crash game with a reduced time-line - 12 months - and having to design the game themselves from scratch.

It would be very, very helpful if this could be stated on the wiki page with a `Development` section as all the other crash games have this section but this does not, and not many people know this. If any evidence is required go on to Crash Mania on the games section and click on wrath of cortex mysteries as well as "Gamasutra interview with Jon Burton (the head of travellers tales)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.240.208 (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Crash Mania can't be proven as a reliable source, but I think Gamasutra is okay, so I'll look into that. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back/GA1
Dunno if you saw, but I've left some more thoughts. J Milburn (talk) 10:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Crash Bash
Hello First I’d like to thank you for what you added to the wrath of cortex it all makes much more sense now.

On the Crash Bash video game wiki page there is not enough information on the successful sales it had achieved. All the other original PS1 Crash games had all the information about the sales. I.e. crash bash sold very well as it achieved 1.6 million in sales. And as a whole the crash bash wiki page looks weak and needs more information, especially the introduction.

It would be very helpful if you could do this

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.106.160 (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Crash bandicoot music section
On the Crash bandicoot series wiki there is no section with music from the series, it would be very useful to have this included as the crash bandicoot videogame music was very popular.

Can you do this please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.101.249 (talk) 15:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Crash bandicoot series
Hello

I have started a music section article on the crash bandicoot series wiki page as there wasn't one. The Crash bandicoot video game music was extremely popular and still is, I as well as others were very suprised to find out that this section hadn't been done, anyway i have started it and it would be very helpful if you could help finish it as it is vital to have this included and also you are very good at doing wiki pages as you are a member.

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.106.163 (talk) 17:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Tomba resolution
I'm sorry things got a bit heated over the merger discussions. If its any consolation, at least most of your writings and improvements are still being implemented, just across 2 articles now, instead of one. Both articles look better, and little to none of your efforts were wasted. Sergecross73  msg me  18:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'd still prefer a more streamlined approach, but I suppose it can't be helped. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NHL 96
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NHL 96 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DasallmächtigeJ -- DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 13:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

NHL 96 DYK
Hello! Your submission of NHL 96 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Just a couple minor questions. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 21:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Good to go. Those SNES NHL games were some of the only sports games I ever played with any regularity, and most of what I know about hockey comes from them. :) I think 94 was the one I played most... Anyway, good job bringing this one to GA. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 04:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NHL 96
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doki Doki Literature Club!
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doki Doki Literature Club! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OliverEastwood -- OliverEastwood (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doki Doki Literature Club!
The article Doki Doki Literature Club! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doki Doki Literature Club! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OliverEastwood -- OliverEastwood (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Doki Doki Literature Club!
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Solstice (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Solstice (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Solstice (video game)
The article Solstice (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Solstice (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Solstice (1990 video game)
valereee (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Road Rash (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Year in review critically acclaimed games sections
Hello Cat's Tuxedo,

I realize you probably put a fair amount of work into these, but I don't think your changes to the Year in Video Gaming lists was actually an improvement (e.g. 2016 in video gaming, 2017 in video gaming ). Most notably, you don't appear to have used any "sanity" threshold on these lists for number of reviews. It's comparatively easy to get a high score off just 4 reviews on obscure sites or the like, but it's misleading to consider that equivalent to more heavily reviewed games reviewed by all the big players. This is a smaller issue, but I also don't see the advantage in including GameRankings. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Archive_119 for one old discussion on the topic. If nothing else, including GR has bloated the length of these lists more than I think is merited - a stylistic preference to be sure, but going more than 25 or so games starts getting a little too long. Basically, I'd rather we go back to one source (MetaCritic) and enforce a threshold of at least 10 reviews to make the resulting list, with mentioning in prose at the end of the table highly scoring games with only a few reviews (both gives them credit, but recognizes they are potentially niche and maybe less reviewed for a reason). SnowFire (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I really only included GameRankings to begin with because in the earlier years, MetaCritic would omit some significant titles for some reason or another (first two Spyros come to mind), and I needed something to balance that out. Goes without saying that I never bothered to set a cut-off year for the GR stuff. Things definitely started getting wonky around when downloadable titles started becoming a thing since what would appear on one aggregate list at a certain threshold wouldn't be on the other, so I wind up having to increase the range just to make sure both aggregates were adequately represented. Anyway, I understand that "hard work" doesn't always equal merit, so I've got no objections to your proposal. Though to make a suggestion, I would say 2002 would be the ideal year to stop including GR since that looks to be the year MC stopped omitting any of the big stuff. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I'd be fine with GameRankings being used even past 2002 (maybe 2010?), just the really recent stuff it's basically just a worse and less accurate copy. I'll give a look into this.  (If I was in charge, it'd be a simple bulleted list of solely game names and platforms as well, but whenever I've added that, someone invariable decides to "help out" and make it a proper table with lots of random extra columns and the like.  Oh well.  I'm a bit of the less-is-more opinion on the topic.)  SnowFire (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * In that case, I'd say 2009's good too; '08 was the last year the sixth gen had any notable critical impact, and '09 does seem to be where the smaller stuff started cluttering things. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash (video game)
The article Road Rash (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Road Rash (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash (video game)
The article Road Rash (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Road Rash (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Road Rash (video game)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Road Rash II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xenon 2: Megablast
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xenon 2: Megablast you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 12:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xenon 2: Megablast
The article Xenon 2: Megablast you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Xenon 2: Megablast for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Doki Doki Literature Club
Would like to apologise for adding the 2018 controversy to the "Doki Doki Literature Club" page earlier today as I didn't know it was removed beforehand. --ItWillBeTossed (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Monika's page
How come Monika's page got deleted? It was sourced and well written. --ItWillBeTossed (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not the one to talk to about that. Try asking the page creator. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash II
The article Road Rash II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Road Rash II for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 08:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Xenon 2: Megablast
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

"Chris Seaver" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chris Seaver. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash II
The article Road Rash II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Road Rash II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 03:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Road Rash II
Hello! Your submission of Road Rash II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Road Rash II
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Crash
Hi, and sorry for asking. But, I'm really wish for Crash Wrath of Cortex and previous installment games are still canon now for upcoming game: Crash 4. I'm really want to... I'm cannot allow that. I'm don't want that game is the retcon. ^_^ --211.194.41.90 (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Your wishes don't matter. Unless an official and reliable source that confirms the canon nature of those entries can be provided, they will be deemed non-canon, and you've no authority to claim otherwise. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I know, but my wishes is matter. Previous installment games are still canon to upcoming game. No non-canon. --211.194.41.90 (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No, they don't. The world does not revolve around your feelings, and accepting that it doesn't is a part of growing up and becoming an adult. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Argh, Fine, I give! Do whenever you want! I'm still don't like non-canon and retcon! *hand slap* --211.194.41.90 (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey ummm, sorry for arguing with you... --211.194.41.90 (talk) 18:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ummm, hello. I'm here to apologize. 0_0 --211.194.41.90 (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Clockwork oranges
Hi. Please I really don't want to do anything other than discuss your edits. As per BRD I think opening a discussion on each talk page is the best way. Thanks. NEDOCHAN (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Very well. I've gone ahead and initiated discussions on the respective pages, so we can continue there. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. I shall respond properly and promptly once I get to a keyboard, which will be in a few hours. Appreciated.NEDOCHAN (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crash Twinsanity
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crash Twinsanity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 22:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crash Twinsanity
The article Crash Twinsanity you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crash Twinsanity for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 02:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Sierra
I read through both sources, and they are dated to 2006, which was when Vivendi Universal Games ceased publishing under their own name. That's why all those games are listed as Sierra even if they weren't originally branded as such. Like sure enough in Europe they were branded as Sierra, but in the US and Japan, they are branded as Vivendi Universal, so please, just take my reasoning right.

Also, why do you have to abbreviate Vivendi Universal on the Crash Twinsanity page? It makes the page look unprofessional. Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The same source identifies Sierra as a brand belonging to Vivendi, so your point is moot. Unless there are equally reliable sources citing differing publication status in other regions, you're better off leaving the matter alone. Also, abbreviation is standard procedure in certain cases and lends to a more concise read; establishing an abbreviation in an article, for example EA for Electronic Arts, ensures that you don't have to use the full name for every instance in the article. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 16:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay, but with EA, their logo uses the abbreviation, while Vivendi Universal didn't, just casually saying. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The VU Games abbreviation has been used by several sources, so it's equally valid here. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * If you say so, that's fine. I'll have to remember that I ever edit on the page again. Good Luck at attempting to make the page a featured article. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuncoLand (September 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FuncoLand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FuncoLand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuncoLand Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuncoLand reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crash Twinsanity
The article Crash Twinsanity you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crash Twinsanity for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toshitaka Shimizu


The article Toshitaka Shimizu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Mostly abandoned, poorly referenced article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 05:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Health
Hey. I was going to review your GAN for Health (game terminology) but I'm hesitant because most sources are offline and I have no access to them. If I was to review the article, would you be able to provide relevant pages, e.g. as scans via email, for review? Regards, IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 22:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't actually own any of the literary sources cited in the article. I translated the vast bulk of the article from the Russian version, which had their equivalent of Good Article status, so I simply used the same citations for the corresponding statements. However, if I needed a more satisfactory reference for any particular statement, I could certainly try to find a suitable online addition/substitute. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 04:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a bummer. ruwiki by itself is not reliable (with or without GA status), so we probably cannot blindly rely on that. Could you check whether the pages are available on Google Books or similar services? IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hardly any of the relevant pages are available in previews from what I can find, sorry to say. At this point, I'm thinking I'm better off just withdrawing my nomination. Can't see a point in forging onward when I'm unable to vouch for those sources. It's what I get for pushing my luck, I guess. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I probably won't be able to take the review under these circumstances, sorry. I wish you luck with whatever you have planned for the article. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Road Rash (CD version) has been accepted
 Road Rash (CD version), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Road_Rash_(CD_version) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Snowycats (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Crash Twinsanity
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

DDLC "fads and trends" thing
Hey! Just wanted to clarify that I have absolutely no problems with DDLC. In fact, I liked the game back when it was popular and still do today. I just thought it qualified as a fad, but I guess not after all.

Remember Baldi's Basics? That was more of a fad than DDLC, imo. It was popular in June 2018 but then kinda died, VERY similar to Fall Guys this August. DDLC didn't really "die", it still has a highly active subreddit and fanbase. It's just not a "trending game" anymore, but trending games aren't the same as fads.

If DDLC is considered a fad just because it got popular, then by that logic Cuphead should also be considered a fad. See the problem in that logic? I do now so I'm sorry for potentially causing edit conflict on the DDLC article. On the Undertale page, I added reliable sources, but could find no such sources for DDLC. So I won't add the category to the page from here on out. --ThisIsSparta2007 (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wild Woody
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wild Woody you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 13:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wild Woody
The article Wild Woody you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wild Woody for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Neo Cortex
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Neo Cortex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Would you be okay with a compromise instead of a Morshu article?
Hello, I know you weren't happy when I created a page for Morshu, however I did it not to joke around, but because he has been one of the most longstanding memes on the internet dating back to when I was in elementary school. Would you be okay with a potential compromise instead? If so what kind of compromise would you be ok with?
 * There's nothing left to discuss. Only subjects with real-world notability get articles, and nothing you could offer changes the fact that this subject has none. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Wild Woody
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Neo Cortex
The article Doctor Neo Cortex you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Doctor Neo Cortex for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CortexSketch.gif
Thanks for uploading File:CortexSketch.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

GAR
Cool World, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Neo Cortex
The article Doctor Neo Cortex you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doctor Neo Cortex for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash (1994 video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Road Rash (1994 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DasallmächtigeJ -- DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 10:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash (1994 video game)
The article Road Rash (1994 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Road Rash (1994 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DasallmächtigeJ -- DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:FuncoLand
Hello, Cat&#39;s Tuxedo. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FuncoLand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:FuncoLand has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FuncoLand. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuncoLand (March 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FuncoLand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FuncoLand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuncoLand Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuncoLand reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghouls &#39;n Ghosts Gameplay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ghouls &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Doctor Neo Cortex
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Road Rash (1994 video game)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bungakuza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bungakuza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bungakuza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Noah 💬 00:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Something about Bob Camp
Recently, I talked with Bob Camp on his Facebook post - https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10225941420785679&id=1339389430&anchor_composer=false and the real reason why he calls himself as the co-creator of Ren and Stimpy, is because he sees some people and verificable proof that don't consider him as the co-creator of Ren and Stimpy as lies and misinformation and he defended himself with his work in the original series as a defense, but because that these verificable proof shows the true side of the creation of Ren and Stimpy (like Bill Wray's 1993 interview), I think we should urgently protect not only Bob Camp's page, as well The Ren & Stimpy Show page here to avoid another fan of Camp add unsourced information he being the "co-creator" of Ren and Stimpy in these pages, like happened with the show's page, when a fan of Bob Camp added a unverifiable source which was an interview with him on YouTube, which was reverted MariaSantanaSilva (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice that Camp sees some people and verificable proof that don't consider him as the co-creator of Ren and Stimpy since the show's beginning, just clarifying here about it MariaSantanaSilva (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of FuncoLand
Hello! Your submission of FuncoLand at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kokopelli7309 (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for FuncoLand
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash 3
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Road Rash 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash 3
The article Road Rash 3 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Road Rash 3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Road Rash 3
The article Road Rash 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Road Rash 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Medes
Hello Cat's Tuxedo. I've started a discussion at Talk:Medes which might be of interest to you. Have a nice day! ~ Zirguezi 21:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Road Rash 3
—valereee (talk) 12:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomba!
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tomba! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomba!
The article Tomba! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tomba! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Two things that oppose each other
How do you like cats but do not own one? I mean, those are your two first userboxes, and the fact that they're so close together yet so contrary in their meanings bothers me :/ Other than that, I agree with all of your userboxes, but please use Twitter... carefully. It's a weird place, at the very least.

And great work on the most underrated Crash game.

But mostly, the point of this section is to warn you about EATEOT. It seems like you're interested but it can get really depressing at times. I'm not gatekeeping or anything, this album has proven to really mess up some people, especially those that had close experiences with dementia. I recommend listening to An Empty Bliss Beyond This World first as sort of a tech demo, whereas EATEOT is the full game. Wetrorave (talk) 13:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I did have a cat for quite some time, but he was put down after a good couple-days-short-of 15 years, and I feel like that was enough. My father and brother do have their own cats, so fortunately I'm still around them, but I'm just personally done with pets.


 * Thanks for reminding me to update my userboxes, seeing how I finally got the boot from Twitter just last month. It was really a matter of time, but can't say there's any sadness there; what I will say is that it takes a pretty sick soul to look at the sentence "Mental illness should not be normalized" and deem it hateful.


 * Another thanks for that, too. Crash is certainly one of my specialties, and Crash 4 gets the credit for reigniting my spark for it whilst getting back in the GA groove after my time away in another ill-fated online venture.


 * Already three hours in, and you shouldn't worry that much. I have no personal experience with such a matter, and as someone with a few Inhale tracks in his library, I'm no stranger to dark ambience.


 * One last thanks for stopping by. Can't say anyone here has ever just sat down and had a chat like this. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, I didn't realize you were already familiar with dark ambient (though even for those, the series can still be a bit too much). And thank you for not using Twitter anymore, it's good for one's mental health :) I would actually deem myself not that good in regards to talking with people and stuff, so it's surprising that I'm apparently bold at it. Haven't got to play Crash 4 yet but it certainly seems great; unfortunately consoles are ridiculously expensive where I live (no, you are not going there, everything is ok) and my PC's got an integrated GPU (though it's an AMD one). ~ Wetrorave (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marc Alfos


The article Marc Alfos has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NACTOR / WP:NENT is reliant on a single reference - noting IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crash Bandicoot: On the Run!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skitchin'
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skitchin' you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Npthura -- Npthura (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of SaGa video games/archive1
Hey Mr. Tuxedo! I was wondering, since you seem like a man of distinction, whether you could see fit to do a small source review for our languishing video game featured list. Just thought I’d ask! 15:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Although I'm certainly unfamiliar with the franchise, sure, I can give it a look. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crash Bandicoot 1 Gameplay.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Crash Bandicoot 1 Gameplay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skitchin'
The article Skitchin' you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skitchin' for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Npthura -- Npthura (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tomba!
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Skitchin'
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Why
why Arkley07 (talk) 13:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Nguyễn Thúy Hiền
Hi. I am just informing you that the issue with the Nguyễn Thúy Hiền DYK nomination has been cleared up. I just removed that paragraph of general statistics. No source explicitly states what was written but it was just info than can be inferred though page surfing. Thank you. Yinglong999 (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rings of Power (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rings of Power (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rings of Power (video game)
The article Rings of Power (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rings of Power (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rings of Power (video game)
The article Rings of Power (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rings of Power (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game)
The article The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game)
The article The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky Lockridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panhandling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Questprobe featuring The Hulk
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Questprobe featuring The Hulk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Questprobe featuring The Hulk
The article Questprobe featuring The Hulk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Questprobe featuring The Hulk for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
The article Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OceanHok -- OceanHok (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Questprobe featuring The Hulk
The article Questprobe featuring The Hulk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Questprobe featuring The Hulk for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Older games definitely can have more than enough sources out there to build them up into GA status or better. :) BOZ (talk) 17:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crash Bandicoot 4 Main Cast.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crash Bandicoot 4 Main Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Rings of Power (video game)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
The article Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
The article Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga
The article The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crash Bandicoot Commercial 1996.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crash Bandicoot Commercial 1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Japanese Crash Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Japanese Crash Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Incredible Hulk (1994 video game)
Hog Farm Talk 04:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga
The article The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Collaboration / Help with Toys for Bob
Hi! I've been trying to figure out who in the Video Game WikiProject might be able to help. I thought you might have the expertise, and hope you might have the time, too. I managed to get Toys for Bob to GA about a year ago, and I'm hoping to get it to FA by the end of the year. I don't want to just get away with throwing the current GA into the FA process, because I think there are probably some gaps that could be filled in their Activision era: specifically any key staff who deserve to be highlighted, and their work on Skylanders, Crash, and Spyro. I saw you had done some high quality editing around these topics, and wanted to see if you felt like collaborating on an FA, or even just helping me dig up some sources I haven't found yet. Would be happy to return the favor on another collaboration that you care about. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I've never really worked on articles for developers before, so I'm not all that confident in my abilities in that area. However, skimming over the page, there's definitely some links that need archiving and publisher credits if you're gunning for FA, and I could certainly pitch in on that front whenever I can find the time. Also, I did get Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time up to GA recently, so you could take a look there and see if there might be some extra sources to use. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The Crash article is exactly what led me to reach out. You're right that I could double check some of the references at that article, and I may start there. Any additional help is definitely appreciated and thanks for the quick reply. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game)
The article The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game)
The article The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredible Hulk (2003 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Questprobe featuring The Hulk
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)