User talk:Cat2906!

March 2024
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  13:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeon Yeo-been, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  09:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeon Yeo-been, you may be blocked from editing.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  09:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply. In order to respond to your request, i tried to amend the content as quickly as possible. However, I don't understand why you kept removing my citations. I responded to whatever you requested me to do but seems that you thought I did it carelessly.  Below are some queries I would like to point out. Appreciate if you could reply to me soon.
 * First, i don't understand why YouTube channel can't be a reliable source. The awarding organization(Netiflix k-content owned by Netflix) conducted the ceremony online via their official YouTube channel each year. Before the ceremony, Netflix allowed people to vote in 10 days. And there were over 4 million people participated and the result would be announced on their official YouTube channel that is Netflix k-content. That means the results could only be released via the YouTube channel. Therefore, the information they provided on the channel is a real primary source which is first-handed, accurate and reliable. That's why i quoted it from there in the first place.
 * Second, it seemed that you dont allow using Youtube as a reliable source. So, in order to make the amendment, I then spent time to source other information online i.e. Mingpao. Mingpao is a Chinese-language newspaper published by Media Chinese International in Hong Kong. The article being published on Jan 1, 2023  is TRUE, REAL AND ACCURATE.  If the news article still can't be treated as a reliable source in the citation, please tell me in what kind of news or publications shall be used. Be honest, I am shocked that you replied that this news article is unsourced or poorly sourced.  May i know why you have such thoughts? The aritcle was being published by an offical newspaper organization.
 * Further, it is noted that other people also provided citations online eg Naver in Korea. Then, why it's incorrect to quote the source from the Youtube video which is the primary source or from an official newspaper online.
 * Besides, the last reply you sent to me made me really shocked, frustrated and disappointed. I spent a lot of time and effort to provide reliable and accurate citations which the two i mentioned above to meet Wikipedia requirement but you kept deleting my work and even told me my account would be blocked. May i know whether you really take time to review and check the sources i provided?
 * If I said anything wrong, please let me know because i have to know in which areas i have to improve so that i can do the amendment quick. I take the updates seriously and do it with all heart. Appreciate your advice. Thank you. Cat2906! (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)