User talk:CatDog45

ELVs
I've gotta say there's a couple of problems with this edit. First of all, you cant have contant rebuttals of the criticisms the same way you cant have constant criticism of the benefits - it just makes the attempt to present both arguments impossible. Also, you're rebutting a segment concerning the ability of all players to be involved with a 'quality of play' statement. They are two completely different things. The argument (and I dont necessarily agree with it) is that efforts to approve quality of play are making it difficult for people with traditional body types. If you have a documented positive effect on rugby at the amateur level, be more specific and put it higher up the article describing the effects of the changes.