User talk:CatatONVIF

June 2016
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Onvif, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 18:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked
I've unblocked you, now that you have changed your name. Happy editing! Bishonen &#124; talk 20:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC).

Hi. Thanks. Does this mean all the revisions I made June 17 are lost? They appear to be :(

CatatONVIF (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) CatatONVIF


 * (I received your e-mail; I'm replying here.) Hi. Your edits from June 17 are lost in the sense that they've been reverted by another user, but that didn't have anything to do with your namechange. You can see the list of your edits here, and you can see the history of the ONVIF page here. Do you see, in the history, C.Fred reverting your edits? (With the edit summary "Back to neutral version".) But they're not lost from the database. You can see every edit you've ever made here by clicking on the word "diff" in your contributions list, or the word "prev" in the history.


 * However. It's common that people think their relation to the subject of an article gives them a certain privilege in editing it; but I'm afraid the opposite is the case. We have a bunch of rules intended to defend the encyclopedia from the pressure of promotion and advertising that we are under.


 * You have a conflict of interest with regard to ONVIF (please click on the "conflict of interest" link and read). Is your position wrt ONVIF a paid one? If it is, you must, by the Wikimedia Foundations Terms of Use, disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways:


 * a statement on your user page,
 * a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or
 * or, a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.


 * Whether or not you're being paid to edit Wikipedia, you are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly. You may propose changes by using the template on the talk page.


 * I realize this is a lot to take in. The short version is: don't put your edits back in the article, propose them on the talkpage, Talk:ONVIF. If you make a convincing case there that the article needs updating, somebody will hopefully act on your proposals. I've pinged C.Fred, perhaps he can help. And I'll try to keep an eye on the talkpage myself, too. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC).

Bishonen,

Thanks for replying. I am indirectly paid by ONVIF, yes, so understood regarding a conflict of interest. So I can suggest edits as you indicated above. Some of the information on membership levels and profiles is incorrect/has changed. That was what I was attempting to edit.

Thanks, Cat

CatatONVIF (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Greetings! I saw Bishonen's message, so I stopped by. The membership levels is probably an easy place to start to show you how to request edits. What you need to do is list, on the article's talk page:
 * What's currently wrong in the article.
 * What it should be changed to.
 * What source supports the change. For something like membership levels, this should be easy enough to provide a link to a page that defines them.
 * The other nice thing is, when it's smaller pieces of an article at a time, it's easier to evaluate what's going on--so several little changes can get made faster than one bigger change.
 * I'll be watching the Talk:ONVIF page, so I'll see any messages you add there. I'll also watch this page, so if you have any questions for me, you can just ask them right here. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

C.Fred,

I just proposed two changes to the initial intro on ONVIF's Wiki listing. Hope I did this right. I can do them one by one as you suggest. If you need additional references, just let me know.

Thanks, Cat

CatatONVIF (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

C.Fred I requested some edits in July and August and they have not been made. Please adivse? Thx.

2604:6000:1501:400D:A4F6:97ED:91FE:6F2A (talk) 18:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I show all the requested edits have been made. —C.Fred (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

C.Fred

They are still showing on ONVIF's Talk page - marked with 'An edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.' Not sure what this means. The updates were to membership levels, profiles and some other key details. Thanks.

67.244.51.75 (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)