User talk:Catch burke

Proposed deletion of Greg attaway
Hello, Catch burke. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Greg attaway, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Greg attaway for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg attaway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Greg attaway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HunterM267 talk 18:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Verifiabilty
Please read wp:v.Slatersteven (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg attaway were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. HunterM267 talk 18:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg attaway


A tag has been placed on Greg attaway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://forums.sandiegouniontribune.com/showthread.php?p=5693491. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Self-published sources
Self-published sources are defined as sources where the users post their own content. This includes social media sites, blogs, and the IMDb. Self-published sources are not considered to be reliable and independent because they lack the established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. As such, these sources are never considered good enough to establish that a person is notable enough for inclusion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)