User talk:Catdreams

Reid Stowe
Hopefully the quotes and references you removed from this article were not vandalism, they have been restored because I believe balance in the article is important. Aloha27 (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't even hint at the idea: Catdream was clearly performing a good-faith edit: he/she stated motivations clearly in the edit summaries, and made reference to talk page discussion as a motivation for the edit. That absolutely, and unambiguously takes the edit far from the realm of vandalism. See remarks in the opening paragraph of Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." You may find his or her edits disagreeable, misguided, or ill-considered; that's another matter entirely. In that regard, I happen to disagree with you, and think that it is best that all parties join the discussion on the talk page. Take care. Gosgood (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)