User talk:Catfights1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jake Esteves (November 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jake Esteves and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jake Esteves, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jake_Esteves Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheAafi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jake_Esteves reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Ihh
Ihh. Catfights1 (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

November 11 2020
In honor of Veterans Day this account is nuking N*ZIS. Catfights1 (talk) 00:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Coffee
I hate tea, it smells awful. Coffee is better. Catfights1 (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

luk3
you are a whiny loser who doesn't do anything and i will end your reign of terrible blocks Catfights1 (talk) 00:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --   LuK3      (Talk)   01:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jake Esteves
Hello, Catfights1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jake Esteves, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jake Esteves


Hello, Catfights1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jake Esteves".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)