User talk:Catfish Jim and the soapdish/Petition

We the undersigned, request that User:Catfish Jim restore the soapdish. Catfish Jim has requested there be 20 signatories for the offer to be considered.

Signatures
comment. Is there a connection between a catfish and a soapdish? I need to know this important piece of information before deciding. Carson101 (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Of course!. — James (Talk • Contribs) • 4:12pm • 06:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) WP:HUMOR never hurt anyone... Oh wait...  N419  BH  06:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) One of the best usernames on the Wiki. Please bring it back Jim. Daicaregos (talk) 07:01, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Absolutely. I don't even know you, but I noticed when the soapdish was gone. Bring it back!  PrincessofLlyr  royal court 15:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Restore :-) Happy Editing! &mdash;  21:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) —  G FOLEY   F OUR  — 02:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) YES. I remember the issue from your RfA and I thought at the time how damned silly the objection was. Far sillier than your former username. Restore it. For the lulz and to confound the bluenozes. Miss E. Lovetinkle (talk) 12:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) YES 100%!  What the hell are you trying to do, confuse all the newbie editors?!!! Seriously, the soapdish is cool and has distinguished you and allowed other editors to remember you more so rather than just one more semi-annon editor that gets forgotten in the mad scheme of things. You are already an excellent Admin.; please keep that in mind too, so people can find you for help editing the Wikipedia. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) Absolutely. One of the best usernames in the history of ever. I would have been a huge fan of that blues band just on name alone.  (note: this statement is not in my official capacity, just my personal opinion as an AWESOME username) Christine, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Yes.  Unlike Christine, I'm commenting in my official capacity.  I think the WMF should make a solid statement in favor of the soapdish.  Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Yes. Aye liked the soapdish. And congrats on the adminship. That slipped by me but you're exactly the sort of person we need for admin duties. -- Derek Ross &#124; Talk'' 06:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Yes. Almost forgot to vote before my break. Carson101 (talk) 17:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) I slightly like it. Rich Farmbrough, 20:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC).
 * 14) I actually stopped by to offer my condolences, hope things eventually works out between you and the soapdish. Kindly  Calmer   Waters  04:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) Support Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) Support Always in favour of it. What do we want? SOAPDISH! When do we want it? NOW! Island Monkey talk the talk 08:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Only in the name of a blues band that never existed.  Catfish  Jim  (ex-soapdish)  15:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Neutral. The soapdish will always be there for me, spelled out or not. Alternatively, you could follow my example and remove the "Catfish" as well, which would have an amusing symmetry. Mac 19:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)