User talk:Cath sal

Speedy deletion of Babelgum Online Film Festival
A tag has been placed on Babelgum Online Film Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 11:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
At the time I deleted it, the page just had a couple of links with no context as to what those links were. That meets Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. Since it's been re-created, I see that it includes references, assertions of notability, etc. It no longer meets the speedy deletion criteria.

For future reference, I'd suggest that when you create articles you begin with an assertion of notability ("...is the first online film festival" is a good one), or at least complete sentences. If you want to have some links handy, put them in a different window. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for the explanations, it's the first page I've created and I was following the guidelines for "your first article" which I understood to mean I should first put in the references before writing any content? Well, I'll carry on working on it and hopefully bring it up to scratch :)
 * Nope - references should go in there to support content. Ideally, this means they should go in at the same time.  But if we see an article that's just a couple of weblinks, we'll conclude it's nonsense and delete it.  But, as I said, you're on the right track now.  Welcome to Wikipedia, and please feel free to contact me if you ever have any more questions. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Babelgum Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Babelgum Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Babelgum Logo2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:Babelgum Logo2009.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Hilary Prince (June 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joe_Decker&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

j⚛e deckertalk 15:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Draft:Hilary Prince concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hilary Prince, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hilary Prince


Hello Cath sal. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Hilary Prince".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)