User talk:Catharinatwice

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CocoRosie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Silver seren C 03:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Freak folk
Can you give me a reliable source where they state that they are not freak folk? Because practically all of the sources discussing their music call them freak folk and if you are removing it because it is your opinion that they aren't or that they don't believe as such, then that is original research. Silver seren C 04:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Catharinatwice, I've got no dispute with you removing "freak folk" if you can replace it with properly cited (to a secondary sources) references that puts them in another genre. You may wish to read up on WP:VERIFY, WP:RS, WP:TRUTH and WP:CITE for more information as to why. If you've got any questions, please ask. Best, R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 04:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's another idea, find sources that claim they "laugh at" (or whatever) being included under the "freak folk" genre, and then perhaps make that statement balanced, such as "Though ... consider them in the genre of freak folk(existing citations), they laugh at being labeled such and do not consider themselves a part of that genre(new citations)". Just a thought... R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 04:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring on CocoRosie
You are currently involved in an edit war on CocoRosie. While the format of a wiki page allows for quick revision and easy restoration of content, continually adding the same content to an article is considered edit warring. Rather than reverting or reinserting material please use the talk page to work your concerns out with other editors. If you continue to revert material on the page the article may be locked from editing or this account may be blocked. Protonk (talk) 05:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)