User talk:CatherineRey19/French intensive gardening

What does the article (or section) do well? A: Enough amount of information in the first paragraph for me to have a rough idea of what is it. Good use of neutral third person tone.

What changes would you suggest overall? A: It is helpful to insert pictures to illustrate intuitively. Since readers may not have the ideas of biodynamic, raised bed, wide bed, or French market gardening. I think it is helpful for me to understand if the first definition sentence is broke down to two or three sentences. I have a question about in the opening definition, it mentions this gradening method require less water, while in the second sentence of the first paragraph of History section, it says "using large amount of water to produce high yields"? Another question is that I thought the section "Traditional Model" is meant to talk about the other traditional gardening methods? But it turned out that it is talking about the steps of French intensive gardening. So I wonder is the tilte of this section can be improved? I would also like to know: 1. How widely is this gardening method used in the US or in the world. 2. By how much is this method superior to other traditional ones.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? A: I think breaking down sentences would increase the understandability of this article. I, as a example, a non-native English speaker, found some sentences are elusive.