User talk:Catherinejarvis

Hhjnj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.185.14 (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Catherinejarvis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! ALI nom nom 17:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Richard Everett
For your first article, this looks great. Nice work! ALI nom nom 17:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Big Two-Hearted River
Re this edit, can you check this edit. I think your removal came from a poorly worded phrase from me, which I have tried to correct. Ceoil (talk) 21:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Buchanan and King
I agree with you in terms of how the Buchanan-King relationship has been described in modern times, despite the scarcity of evidence. I just updated the relevant passage on the William R. King page and fixed one of the footnote references. Please take a look at it and let me know what you think. If we have the right tone and facts captured, that's good. If not, please let me know. Billmckern (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

You receive the barnstar for your work in insisting on precision in articles, and upholding the true mission of WikipediaOnonuofk (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright
"Wikipedia articles are not carved in stone; they are not even copyrighted." Yes they are. Please read WP:COPYRIGHT and amend your user page. Helen Online  17:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Katharine Hepburn
Hi, in case you don't see it I just wanted to let you know I've replied to your comment at Talk:Katharine Hepburn. Cheers, -- Loeba (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: Madonna
Yes, I agree also. Would you like to participate in an informal review of the article? Myself and two other editors are trying to weed out the fancruft through an informal review on the article talk page and your contributions would be welcome! —JennKR | ☎ 00:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Max Baucus Name Change
Catherine,

While I appreciate your no-nonsense or "gossip" deletionist principles on articles, you deleted a talk point that I had made. The reason I put it into the talk, rather than the article, was to create a discussion and maybe prompt people to search for sources. A seemingly toxic comment, out of context, it was not entirely false. Source: He's my cousin, although I have no vested interest since I am not, nor ever was, an heir to Stephen Enke's estate. That source, in and of itself, also does not follow article guidelines, but since I did not include it in the article it should not be deleted. There is an interesting story here, and seems to have been eradicated from record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.198.202.26 (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Grace Kelly
Hi,

We are Cornell University students working on a class project that involves the editing of Wikipedia pages. We are all very new to the Wikipedia editing process, and as such we were hoping for some feedback from some more experienced editors on our edits to the Grace Kelly article. We were wondering if you could assist us by verifying our sources, which we posted [|] on the article's talk page. We were also hoping to make some minor changes to the structure of the article and were hoping for some input on that as well. Our plan for the new structure is as follows:

PERSONAL LIFE
 * Family
 * Marriage
 * Wedding
 * Later Years
 * Death

Career
 * Movies
 * Awards
 * Fashion
 * Modeling

Legacy
 * Style
 * Links to the Community
 * Historical Sites
 * Philanthropy

Our group members have the following user pages:

- dcl248

- Kategruenberg

- Mfrosselot

- CeciliaIachetta

In this link you can find our Wikipedia class page and the description of our assignment: Cornell University Online Communities (Fall 2014)

We hope to hear back from you soon! Kategruenberg (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)