User talk:Catherinelegge/sandbox

Excellent article evaluation, Catherine! You really took the time to think about the LVH article and to propose ways in which the article could be improved. If you apply the same attention to detail with your own article draft, you will do very well. I look forward to reading your draft. Griffyn1987 (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Catherine, Indie and Jazmyn,

You have a well-detailed sandbox entry about FATF. I like that you have expanded on ‘Goals and Objectives’ and ‘How To Become an Observer’ specifically!You have used good, reliable sources throughout the article. Except for source number 4 and 5 (you should use the ‘reuse source’ option instead of listing  it as 2 different sources) where it leads to Wolters Kluver’s main web page and does not have any information relating to anti-money laundering jurisdictions. You should also list source 6 and 8 as a single source, there is no need to post the same link twice. I believe you can expand on the history section as I noticed there was nothing cited. Some suggestions for overall expansion would be how do they combat money laundering exactly, what are their strategies on combating terrorist financing and is there a method of measurement? Has FATF been completely effective? If so, how and a few real-life examples would be useful. Are there any criticisms towards FATF? How is FATF structured, are there subordinate agencies, sister companies, who are the directors? FATF also focuses on combating corruption, there is a lot of material related to it on their website that you can talk about. There is also a good opportunity for you to talk about mutual evaluation within FATF. Overall, I think you have a lot more opportunity and space to grow the article and I am sure you guys would do really well on it. I hope I have helped a little by providing this feedback, I cannot wait to be able to read your finished Wikipedia article. Good luck! Yashwenee Selvaraju (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC) Yashwenee Selvaraju

Thank you for your feedback, it was very helpful, the questions you suggested were great and have given us more ideas on where to take the article, thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catherinelegge (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)