User talk:Cathleclerc123

Your email
Hi, I have looked again at Draft:Stingray Business, but I find it too promotional to restore, even as a draft. I think it is better to start from scratch, using neutral language from the very beginning. If you disagree, you can try at WP:REFUND to see whether another admin is willing to undelete. --Randykitty (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * , are you saying the topic isn't notable and the information couldn't be rewritten with a neutral point of view? If that is what you are saying, then tell this editor that their article isn't notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia instead of telling them to start from scratch. Per WP:CSD, If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion.  Also, I'll note that Drafts are meant to be works in progress, and most will not meet Wikipedia's standards for quality at first. per Drafts (yes, I acknowledge that is says "though a special deletion policy for drafts has not been decided" and that it says "drafts that are copyright violations, vandalism, BLP violations or blatant advertising or promotion will be speedily deleted" but maintain that unless the topic isn't notable, then it falls off the fine line defined in the G11 criteria). Draftspace drafts are equivalent to userspace drafts because let's face it, a draft is a draft as long as it's not in article space.  That said, User pages suggests that Unsuitable pages, media and images in userspace may also be nominated for deletion or (if appropriate) speedy deleted, but special care should be taken as the user may be expecting leeway and take it personally, and there are a few exceptions. (emphasis mine).  So, if you are unwilling to restore this draft to Draft: space, then, assuming this is a notable topic, I request that you properly USERFY it and put it into  user space here granting that leeway. Thank you. —   15:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have not checked whether the topic is notable. G11 has nothing to do with notability, but with content being promotional. Promotional content gets routinely deleted whether it is in main space, draft space, or user space. I am perfectly willing to give leeway for something that is of doubtful notability (I would never delete a draft or a user space page under A7, for example), but not for copyvio or promotional material. Cathleclerc123 just sent me another email and requested that I sent her the previous content by email (I will do that as soon as I have saved this response), which seems the perfect solution to me. --Randykitty (talk) 15:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stin bu


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rankersbo (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)