User talk:Cathofsiena

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Opus Dei‎, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you made a mistake. Cathofsiena was just reverting a user, who has just been blocked for 2 weeks for wide-ranging disruption.  Esowteric  +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   17:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, Cathofsiena clearly tried to vandalize the lead of Opus Dei and made absurd claims about source validity (NPR’s piece has most certainly not been discredited). Just look at the edit summaries "because the edit was a non-neutral edit of someone with an agenda who is ill informed” " due to vandalism in page editing” “You cannot call Opus Dei a "secret society" based on 3 discredited works from decades ago. Nor can it be called a "brainwashing cult" when all Popes (from Pius XII to Francis) have praised Opus Dei, its message, aims and methods. The revisions are highly biased as well as being simply false". Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Opus Dei, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Opus Dei, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Opus Dei. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Opus Dei. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Chris &#124; Crazycomputers (talk) 18:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)