User talk:Catolicoantiguo

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Carmel Henry Carfora has been reverted. Your edit here to Carmel Henry Carfora was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://oldromancatholic.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Single-purpose account
You appear to be a Single-purpose account. Please do not add back unsourced information, as per WP:BURDEN. And do not add external links inside of articles, as per WP:EL.

Oh, and do not think that other users will not check the edits you have made, lying in your edit summaries is not acceped. Veverve (talk) 12:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carmel Henry Carfora. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * All edits are historically verifiable and found among the primary sources housed in Church Archives. Catolicoantiguo (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Only WP:PUBLISHED sources are accepted on Wikipedia. Also, WP:BURDEN. Veverve (talk) 12:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Carmel Henry Carfora, you may be blocked from editing. Veverve (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please check WP:REFERENCE to know what a reference is. WP:EDITWARing and violating WP:BURDEN. Veverve (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Catolicoantiguo! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Carmel Henry Carfora that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Archer1234 (t·c) 14:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Very helpful information... thank you! Catolicoantiguo (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

"ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARCHBISHOP_CARMELO_HENRY_ALFONSO_MARIA_CARFORA&redirect=no ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

WP:CFORK is not allowed
Creating twice ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA because what you add is only unsourced material, is WP:CFORKing and is not allowed. Veverve (talk) 12:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA


A tag has been placed on ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 14. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Veverve (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at ARCHBISHOP CARMELO HENRY ALFONSO MARIA CARFORA. Veverve (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Veverve. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Carmel Henry Carfora have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Carmel Henry Carfora. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''You have been edit-warring over months on this page. Please stop or you will get blocked.'' Veverve (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.