User talk:Catonisdonis

Welcome!
Hello, Catonisdonis, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Reply
Since you have an obvious conflict of interest, you must declare it. You are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . Please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls


 * Your sources included your own website and a blog site using your statistics, hardly reputable independent third-party sources


 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * Your text provided little to show notability, existence isn't enough. You said little about the company, not even a city location for your office, if you have one. locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.


 * Your text was basically just "this is what we do", with no real facts, including obvious self-promotion like  a tech-for-good business, that is focused on creating positive and tangible environmental impact... committed to positive change for our planet. You also said uses 10% of all revenue it earns to directly support environmental and nature restoration projects across the UK. So is that £10 or £1,000,000? Meaningless as it stands.

For completeness:
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Jim,
 * Thank you for the thorough feedback; it is appreciated and noted. We are an early-stage company and it was suggested to me to one of our partners to add us to the UK MVNO list page, as I did initially and then thought best that it linked to some more info for context. The intention was to have a stub listing that could be used as a reference point and expanded in future as our environmental and charity partnerships are announced and full details are covered in the coming months. I recognise now, thanks to your clear explanation and the linked documents, that this is clearly not the relevant approach nor time to be listed on Wikipedia. My approach has clearly been misguided, but there really was no ill-intent behind it. I am hopeful that in near future Meaningful Planet will more than qualify for notability due to our efforts over the coming years, but I will leave it to others to handle the addition to Wikipedia when they feel it merits it.
 * Thank you for your time and feedback. Catonisdonis (talk) 11:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)