User talk:Cats' photos

Replaceable fair use File:Emma Morano.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Emma Morano.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 23:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have written an explanation on the discussion page and I have added the tag which you have indicated.--Cats&#39; photos (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Emma Morano (2016).jpg
Hello. Per WP:NFCC, we must respect the very high commercial interests of Reuters, which is a press agency. Therefore, the image cannot be used. Also, I tagged it with "db-f7". --George Ho (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Daily Mail
Hi Cats' photos. About your recent edit to Human, I wanted you to be aware of this RfC. Best to find another source, I think. Rivertorch  FIRE WATER   15:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:Human_growth_and_development_sidebar
the old image is much better cats should leave it be. that image has been there for years should discuses before changing it again if you really want too. if you rvt again without talking first I will just rvt again and also report you. Also drawing of a fetus in the womb by Leonardo is a much better representation of human growth and development then random photos as well. I already talked with users on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/chat and they agree with me as well on this

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Countersurveillance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locks. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chieti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Linden and Cedars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chieti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqueduct.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)