User talk:Catsclaw

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Alteras
A tag has been placed on Jacob Alteras requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 20:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * hey buddy you are being talke about on WP:ANI you should go there to speak to an admin and hsare your side of the dipsute. User:Smith Jones 16:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Marianne Vos
Hi, regarding your alterations to the infobox at Marianne Vos, there's no (current) other articles which use the headers/split out events like your edits suggest. If you want to discuss how to split out events in the 'major wins section' of the cyclist infobox, please raise this at WT:CYC, where it can be discussed by all and we can move to a consensus. I'm not against your proposed changes, nor for them, but the alterations you want to make are currently anomalous across cyclist articles. Thanks, XyZAn (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)