User talk:Cattbrown86/sandbox/Riga

Spelling & Grammar:
-Both are great! -"According to the Central Statics Bureau..." (Statistics?)

Language:
-Very good. Encyclopedic in tone, concise, and proper.

Organization:
-Great!

Coding:
-No coding errors in your references. -One minor thing: all of your in-text citations are spaced from the end punctuation. They should be right off the sentence.

Completeness:
-Each section looks good and complete. I assume you're still going to add to the "sex industry" part.

Relevance:
-Everything is relevant!

Citations:
-Needs one more. -All others open to legitimate, solid sources.

Hi Caitlin! This is very well-written; you did a really great job!Avictory (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

=Evaluations=

3/21/2018 Evaluation by Reesehanson
Reese Hanson (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Standards Everything looks perfect.

Language
Meets standards Very good diction.

Organization
Exceeds Standards It was broken up by section very well.

Coding
Meets Standards Everything looks good, can't find any errors.

Validity
Meets Standards Everything was sourced to information and looks valid.

Completion
Complete Very complete with lots of interesting information.

Relevance
Meets Standards All the information looked relevant and was current.