User talk:Causeality

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. NJGW (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NJGW (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Drecession
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Drecession, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary for neologisms.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. De728631 (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. T L Miles (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Note: vandalism only account
Since this account was created, you have used it to make eight edits. Seven have been reverted as vandalism. One has been marked as a hoax/neologism. I think you'll find that this is a waste of your time, as continued behavior will result in all your edits being reverted and your account being blocked. If you wish to contribute to this project, please visit WP:WELCOME to find out how. T L Miles (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)