User talk:CautionGap

March 2022
Your recent editing history at British Democratic Party (2013) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 16:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you Czello,
 * Sorry, I did not know I was in an edit war as this is the first time I have edited. I actually thought I had not saved the page correctly and did not realise someone else was changing it back.
 * Regards,
 * CautionGap CautionGap (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Czello,
 * The reason I removed the paragraph was because Nick Lowels statement is clearly designed to caste the party in a bad light. He is not impartial and he has a biased view. I would say it would be the equivalent of the Monday club commenting on Jeremy Corbyn.
 * Regards,
 * Caution Gap CautionGap (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think the best place to discuss this is on the article's talk page, at Talk:British Democratic Party (2013), as other editors have also argued for its inclusion. However it's worth mentioning that if the source is considered notable, their commentary is fair to include even if they are not impartial. — Czello 18:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)