User talk:Cavarrone/Archive 4

A cookie for you!

 * Many thanks! --Cavarrone 07:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Onyx Moonshine
Hi there - I noticed that you had deleted some additional information I had included in a Background section as being too promotional. Having reviewed what I had added I can see that the additional information was probably borderline. Fbell74 (talk) 08:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Baldini & Castoldi
Hi Cavarrone,

Thanks for your appreciation of |my little grammar correction in the article Baldini & Castoldi :-) Eliashedberg (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Eurospy films
Hello Cavarrone,

I learned you are an connoisseur of Eurospy films when I checked the history of Agent 3S3: Passport to Hell and Agent 3S3, Massacre in the Sun. Well, unfortunately this genre seems to be extinct in France and Italy but there is currently some kind of revival going on. This time the Eurospy films are coming from Sweden. Are you interested in films like Hamilton: In the Interest of the Nation? By the way, has this film been released in Italy? So far I only know it was on TV in France, the other original home country of Eurospy films... Thanks for your attention. NordhornerII (talk)_The man from Nordhorn 08:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sadly it was not yet released in Italy in any format, nor I think it will be released soon. Not surprising, I'm still waiting the release of the two OSS 117 starred by Jean Dujardin that were released almost everywhere... however let me thank you one more time for the great work you are doing! Cavarrone 09:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately European filmmakers don't have the incredible amount of money to produce a "blockbuster" and that seems to be enough to make their films already appear as "B-films". I wished there was a little more solidarity in Europe. Well, on the other hand it is great that there is solidarity amoung Wikipedians. I appreciate that. NordhornerII (talk)_The man from Nordhorn 23:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Huh?
Doesn't matter given the outcome, but how do you vote "snow keep per WP:HEY" when that particular item references the idea that works need to be done to an aricle for it not be deleted? I haven't come across HEY before, so I'm curious. MSJapan (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:HEY means that during the debate some editors made some significant improvements to the article to justify a "keep" vote. In Yellowdog Updater, Modified users W.Nowicki and GM83 largely improved, referenced and expanded the article ; without these improvements deletion would be justified or at least debatable, but the improvements addressed the issues. Other examples: Articles for deletion/Daphne Civic Center, Articles for deletion/Sophie conran, Newbridge on Wye railway station. Cavarrone  19:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Cavarrone. I have re-added my correct state of birth and information about my clothing store. Please stop removing this information as it is 100% correct info. I am Amia Miley and can verify this. If you have any questions, feel free to ask my verified twitter account @amiamiley Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amiamiley (talk • contribs) 03:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Seriously, please check your facts and don't be rude by spamming the same template multiple times. NFC enforcement is exempt from 3RR. There is an allowance of 1 image for identification, any beyond that require critical commentary and reliable sources about the image itself. Werieth (talk) 22:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thanks to you for having fixed the link so fast! Cavarrone 17:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I use my eMail address instead of a watchlist, so I only get the most relevant eMails. You ought to try it.-- Laun  chba  ller  18:16, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Il Profeta di satana
Hi, this book is released in Italy and in this country is a bestseller. The author met Ramirez in '90 who confessed his life before being called The Night Stalker. You know that Carlo and Franco are not the only authors that met or talked to Ricardo Ramirez, and your colleague Bg19bot should make such advertising Carlo. Wikipedia is not a magazine to serve personal interests I think. I'm not angry but a little disappointed.Your threats also are not very acceptable. If you like it or not, the book exists and we must speak of it on Wikipedia. Thank you anyway and good work Dimaggio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimaggio30 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm Italian, and I doubt that the book is a bestseller in this country. The sources do not support notability. You need to read WP:NBOOKS to understand the criteria of notability for books. I'm moving to nominate the book for deletion. Cavarrone 20:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Sad for Wikipedia
I see that you answer as a dictator, I am also Italian and I know what I'm saying. I have no interest in advertising in this book but I think the others persons abusing their authority and this is very sad... Dimaggio


 * Discuss the notability of the book here. Cavarrone 20:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't like may page?
Hello if you don't like my page i cancel myself...sorry! vracvrac
 * I "like" the page, but the book does not appear notable enough for a separate article. Some informations could be eventually included in the book author article. Please read WP:NBOOKS, then you are free to share your opinion  here. Not every book is notable per Wikipedia criteria. Cavarrone  21:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your contributions to Italian actresses
If you insert, it is only once necessary to write the full name  , the second and third time write only  . Don't forget:

== References ==

at the bottom of the page. It is better to use names as Lancia or dizionario than abbreviations bfb and fbf. Best wishes. --Frze (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * yeah, I know, I'm in the middle of some major expansions, at the end I will fix them all.Cavarrone 13:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Photos German Wikipedia
Sofern der Urheber dieses Werkes nicht mindestens 70 Jahre tot ist, ist das Werk in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz – außer es greifen andere Regelungen – urheberrechtlich geschützt, da der Schutzfristenvergleich nicht angewendet wird. Daher darf diese Datei in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia möglicherweise nicht verwendet werden. Siehe zur Verwendung unbedingt Wikipedia:Bildrechte! Falls danach nicht zulässig, müssen die Einbindungen entfernt werden.

Se l'autore di questo lavoro non è almeno 70 anni morto, è l'impianto in Germania, Austria e Svizzera - a meno soggetto ad altri regolamenti - non viene applicata protetti da copyright a causa della durata più breve. Pertanto, questo file può essere utilizzato nella Wikipedia tedesca non possono essere utilizzate. Vedere come utilizzare assolutamente Wikipedia: Diritti di immagine! Se poi non è permesso le affiliazioni devono essere rimossi.

Best wishes --Frze (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Dieses Foto ist in Italien gemeinfrei, weil es zuerst in Italien veröffentlicht wurde und das Urheberrecht abgelaufen ist. Laut Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte n.633, 22. April 1941 und späteren Ausgaben, sind einfache Bilder von Menschen oder von Aspekten, Elementen und Sachverhalten des natürlichen oder gesellschaftlichen Lebens, die mit fotografischen Prozessen oder einem analogen Verfahren erhalten wurden, darunter auch Reproduktionen der bildenden Kunst und Standbilder aus Filmen von Filmmaterialien (Art. 87) für einen Zeitraum von 20 Jahren ab Erschaffung geschützt (Art. 92). Diese Bestimmung gilt nicht für Aufnahmen von Schriften, Dokumenten, Geschäftspapieren, materiellen Objekten, technischen Zeichnungen und ähnlichen Erzeugnissen (Art. 87). Das italienische Recht unterscheidet grundsätzlich zwischen Werken der Fotokunst und einfachen Lichtbildern. (Art. 2, § 7). Werke der Fotokunst sind für 70 Jahre nach Ableben des Urhebers geschützt (Art. 32 bis), während einfache Fotografien für einen Zeitraum von 20 Jahren nach Schaffung geschützt sind. Es handelt sich nicht um einfache Aufnahmen, wenn künstlerischer Wert oder Reflexionen der Kreativität respektive Persönlichkeit des Fotografen erkennbar sind.

Questa foto è di dominio pubblico in Italia perché è stato pubblicato la prima volta in Italia e il suo copyright è scaduto. Secondo il Copyright and Related Rights n.633, 22 Aprile 1941 e successive edizioni, sono semplici immagini di persone o di aspetti, elementi e fatti della vita naturale o sociale, ottenute con processo fotografico o un processo analogo, comprese le riproduzioni di arte e di scena i film di stock cinematografiche (Art. 87) per un periodo di 20 anni dalla creazione di protezione (articolo 92). La presente disposizione non si applica alle fotografie di scritti, documenti, carte di affari, oggetti materiali, disegni tecnici e prodotti simili (Art. 87). Legge italiana distingue tra opere d'arte fotografiche e fotografie semplici. (Art. 2, § 7). Opere d'arte fotografica sono protette per 70 anni dopo la morte dell'autore (articolo 32 bis), mentre le fotografie semplici sono protette per un periodo di 20 anni dopo la creazione. Non è facile ripresa quando pregio artistico o riflessioni del fotografo creatività rispettivamente personalità sono evidenti.

Best wishes --Frze (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=566682156 your edit] to Lizz Tayler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569374659 your edit] to Odoardo Spadaro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Odoardo Spadaro|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * 2 December 2012|newspaper=La Voce d'Italia|date=9 August 2010}} Tayler has appeared in a music video with rap artist JMC. {{cite news|title=Brittany Andrews, Lizz Tayler Team to
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Odoardo Eugenio Giano Spadaro ( 16 January 1893 - 26 June 1965) was an Italian singer-songwriter and actor.

Thanks!
Thanks for taking the time to review the Robotic clusters prod; I expect that's a relatively thankless chore, so here's my attempt at making it less so. You're right&mdash;that article is a relatively subtle case and AfD is the better venue for it. I've nominated it there.

Best,

Lesser Cartographies (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well done, I have no strong opinion on the matter, but surely AfD is a proper venue to discuss it. My best, Cavarrone 06:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

 Erpert  Who is this guy? 16:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion needed
Hi Cavarrone, I noticed you were one of the people who reverted User:Werieth's edit on I Think We're Alone Now article for the removal of a single art cover for a cover version. There's currently a discussion about keeping the image or not: Talk:I Think We're Alone Now. Your opinion would be appreciated. Thanks!--SuperHotWiki (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood
I would like input regarding | This edit. I have had a lengthy discussion with the editor, who has been very civil with me but we have yet to reach an agreement


 * | The US.com article where Dina Eastwood exclusively announced her marital separation states: Married since March 31, 1996, Dina and the Million Dollar Baby director have one daughter together, 16-year-old Morgan. Eastwood is also dad to seven other kids, though he has only been married once before.


 * | The Los Angeles Times states that Eastwood has 8 children: Clint has one child with Dina: 16-year-old Morgan. The "Gran Torino" director and actor has seven other children from various relationships


 * | USA Today also confirms that Eastwood has 8 children: The couple have one daughter, Morgan, 16. Eastwood has seven other children.


 * | As does EXTRA.com: The couple has one daughter together, 16-year-old Morgan. Eastwood, 83, has seven other children from various relationships


 * | Alison Eastwood stated "My dad has eight children by six women" in an August 2011 interview with The Sunday Times.

These are all very reliable sources. The third is especially concrete &mdash; his own daughter confirms that he has eight kids by six women. The quote should be restored, because all evidence indicates that it's the truth. There are no legitimate news reports stating who the mystery 8th child is, but that should not prevent the statement and the quote stating how many children he has from being present in the article. 02:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * User:Mystiques00 is guilty of canvassing even after he had been warned not to. I have asked him to remove his non-neutral canvassing posts to you and other editors. As for the arguments he posits for an unsubstantiated rumor, they've already been addressed and debunked at Talk:Clint Eastwood. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Preparati la bara!.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Preparati la bara!.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Sacro GRA
And thanks to you for creating the article too!  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

You may be interested
In expressing opinion at BOTREQ. If enough people comment there, maybe something will finally happen. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of The White Warrior?
Hello Cavarrone. Can I ask why you want to delete the redirect page The White Warrior. It's a valid G7 request, but the page appears to be a useful redirect. Am I missing something?-- Mojo Hand (talk) 19:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * OK - that's a valid reason and I have made the deletion. FYI - you can use Db-move in situations where you are not the only editor.-- Mojo Hand (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Moves over redirects
Hi Cavarrone, I moved L'arbitro back to the disambiguated title. Did you know you can move articles over redirects to the article if the redirect doesn't have more in it's history? In such cases you can do the move yourself (not that I mind doing it for you, I'm happy to help) Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573673754 your edit] to List of Italian films of 1976 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * |La Orca || Eriprando Visconti || [Michele Placido], Rena Niehaus || Drama ||

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573691887 your edit] to List of Italian films of 1976 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * | Paura in città ||Giuseppe Rosati || Maurizio Merli, [James Mason], Cyril Cusack, Silvia Dionisio || Poliziottesco ||

Courtesy Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 01:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Alberto Camerini
Ciao, ho visto che sei tu quello che ha fatto su per primo la voce su l'Alberto Camerini: grazie! :-) Scusami se ho fatto correzioni: ho cercato di mantenere il testo più possibile vicino al tuo originale, ma ho voluto rendere la voce leggibile a coloro che non conoscono l'Italiano. Mi piacerebbe fare aggiunte e ampliarla, spero tu non abbia niente in contrario. Ho anche cominciato una pagina su l'Alberto sulla LMO e presto ne farò una in Tedesco, e magari una in Bavarese, non so, però farò tutto su un pò alla volta.

Ti volevo chiedere se ci sono dei problemi di copyright ad aggiungere foto e roba del genere... Il camerini mi rimanda alla mia adolscenza in una Milano avant guarde e bellissima.

Ciao, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.128.141.124 (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Ho creato un conto! :-) --Mondschein English (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Ciao, dunque il tuo Inglese non è affatto mediocre, è solo che l'Inglese è una lingua facile per comunicazioni facili, ma si apre a facili fraintendimenti quando l'argomento si fa più difficile, più tecnico. Dunque, scusami le mie domande da dilettante, ma perchè devono essere le foto antecedenti al 76? Cosa pensi se scrivo alla pagina ufficiale del Camerini e chiedo a loro se posso utilizzare delle foto? Per esempio vedo che anche la pagina wiki in Italiano non ha alcuna foto, purtroppo... La pagina sulla LMO sta andando avanti. Pesnsavo di mettere dei link a tutte le canzoni che possono essere ascoltate su Youtube: cosa ne pensi? Non è vietato, vero? Ciao, Andreas --Mondschein English (talk) 00:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cannabis (film).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cannabis (film).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

South Philadelphia Athenaeum
You mentioned that you found some sources in Google Books for this. I've checked and can't find any, but if there are useful references on this item I'd like to add them. - SimonP (talk) 09:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Canvassing. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Loredana Cannata
Dear Cavarrone, I, and thanks a lot to have corrected my mistakes in this page.

I'm not native English speaker, and I would like to ask your help again for the future. May I?

Have a nice week end

Rei Momo (talk) 13:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not a native English too, and my English is far from perfect, however you are welcome to ping me if you need some help. Cavarrone 17:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Tè, Rei Momo, a me sun parmitüü de dagh una müdada anca mi, inscì de réndela manch düra de cumprend de quij che parl' Ingles. Tanc curdiaj Salüd, --Mondschein English (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Ciao, Cavarrone, mi sono permesso di fare un qualche cambiamento anche io, così da renderla più facile da leggere per quelli che parlano inglese. Cordiali saluti, --Mondschein English (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Hello, I took the liberty to make a couple of changes, as well, in order to make it a bit easier for English speakers to read. Regards, --Mondschein English (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

La moglie vergine
Hi. There are French dialogues between tourists Valentina and Giovannino meet at the beginning of the film and also in the segment featuring Valentina with Maurice (Gianfranco De Angelis). Behemoth (talk) 07:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Behemoth (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: the article Subir Banerjee
First, I was not aware of the AfD, I thought it was a redirect to begin with (even though I now see in the article history that I gad edited in the original article, prior to AfD, in 2008). I agree with the 2011 AfD that, at that time, it was better as a redirect to Pather Panchali. However, now that a film is made based on Subir Banerjee's life and that new film's director won the best director's prize for the film, does that make the person meet notability criteria?--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Yes, I should have incorporated The Times of India article as a reference. Indeed I thought to do so, but forgot. Now, the article has some references.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Zoe Voss
Hello Cavarrone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Zoe Voss, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Does not meet WP:G7. Substantial content of this page has been added by other editors.''' Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That was only my opinion, based on what I could see. Please feel free to re-nominate again. Other admins may take a different view. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Philip Glass
I'm sorry for creation of duplicate category. And thanks for repair. --Marek Koudelka (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Problems concerning my page-tagging
Your feedback was indeed very useful for tagging pages. I tag this page with refimprove here as i find content was first referenced from wordpress.com (personal blog) and second was primary source. Can you please correct me if this wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsalleasy (talk • contribs) 18:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Gabriele Tinti (writer)
Hi, I do not agree that Gabriele Tinti (writer) has a 'patent lack' of secondary sources. It refs the UK Poetry Library, The Boston Centre for the Arts, Drone Magazine, The Triennale Design Museum Milan, The Dumbo Arts Museum, The Museum of Contemporary Arts Rome, and the Queens Museum New York. He has two videos of readings. I think the ratio speaks for itself. Perhaps you did not see that I had added new refs before removing the tag. Thanks Span (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Monella (Tinto Brass)
Hello. I noticed that the article Monella (film) was blanked and reverted to the article Tinto Brass. I restored an earlier version of the page. If this constitutes any breach whatsoever, please inform me. Thanks in advance. Ahriman2014 (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. I was the one who started the article and uploaded the image. Now, first came an idiot who blanked the page and then another that deleted the image for it was supposedly "orphan". I really don't have the nerves to deal with such jerks who are endowed with full mastery in acting according to the hypocritical manners of Wikipedia so I don't want to contact with any of them. Best regards. Ahriman2014 (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Cities of Gold
Please remove nickbits.co.uk from the file - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Mysterious_Cities_of_Gold.jpg#filelinks - reference. I have not given you permission to use anything on my site or to reference me. Please remove reference to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.252.97 (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Yasmine Lafitte
Hi, I noticed you have recently contributed to the deletion discussion on the above in which you accused the nominator of targetting articles on foreign (ie non English speaking) individuals. I noticed the discussion as I was seeking background information on the nominator of the Carmel Moore deletion. I would point out that the nominator also nominates English speaking individuals as in this case. It may be more accurate to describe the nominator as someone who inhabits a world where anything that is not American is not significant.Graemp (talk) 11:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think his interest for deleting this kind of subjects is related to this page, some sort of WIKIPEDIA DELETIONS:THE GAME in which he marks every deletion he obtained with the corresponding flag. The objective in (t)his game is accumulating as many national flags as possible, and as you can see he actually still lacks the British flag... About my "accusation", I just quoted what one another editor said in Articles for deletion/Teresa Orlowski. Looking at his deletion arguments, there are two different issues, the claimed "PORNBIO failure" and the claimed "GNG failure". About the former, this editor is used to claim that "every award" is not "significant and well-known" and, in cases in which PORNBIO is clearly met, then the subject should be deleted as well (eg see this discussion). It's pretty impossible discussing about PORNBIO on these basis. About the latter, the problem is much more serious. Finnegas has been warned several times about his blatant lack of WP:BEFORE related to subjects who have received a bunch of press coverage in non-English sources, but his response is always that he doesn't consider foreign sources as he does not speak French (or Japanese, or Finnish, or German). I assume he knows very well this kind of conduct is clearly disruptive, evidently the attraction of conquering another flag for his precious game is too much. I am monitoring his/her conduct, he was quite quiet in the past month but now he seems to have taken the same disruptive path as before. If he will continue, he will be surely banned from afd discussions. Cavarrone 12:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, this page is clearly an odd page to create and an odd way to record your deletions. I assume that GNG is largely immaterial given the existence of PORNBIO. I don't know enough about wikipedia to know if he (or anyone else) is actually 'employed' by them to clean up stuff or if he just has a particular interest in getting stuff deleted. I trust wikipedia will move against him if he is creating more problems than he is solving. I'm not a regular contributor to deletion discussions so you are welcome to let me know if and when things are taken further. For my part, I am mainly interested to see how the Carmel Moore discussion plays out before I form a clear opinion of him and the way wikipedia interprets PORNBIO.Graemp (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * , nah, Wikipedia does not "employ" anyone to delete stuff, otherwise more competent people would be chosen. Anyone is free to start a deletion discussion if he thinks a subject fails our notability guidelines. About GNG/PORNBIO, the two guidelines are not mutually exclusive, and generally GNG is a stronger evidence of notability than PORNBIO. Cavarrone  14:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Really? - It is hard to understand anyone who would want to spend the vast majority of their wikipedia time, trying to delete stuff. You may be right about GNG but for me PORNBIO seems a more clear cut policy and therefore easier to argue one way or the other. BTW, I am holding back my central argument on Carmel Moore until I see more of how the discussion goes. Do you know how much time they allow? Graemp (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * One week, then if a clear consensus does not emerge the discussion could be extended by one or two weeks. Do not matter the number of votes, but the strength of arguments (and his arguments actually are quite weak in both the discussions). About the rest, as you said, "it is hard to understand anyone who would want to spend the vast majority of their wikipedia time, trying to delete stuff" and not improving our articles. But, as I pointed above, so many people live Wikipedia not like a collaborative encyclopedia but like a game. Cavarrone 14:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Cav, I note that Finnegas has conceded defeat on Yasmine Lafitte but has not done so on Carmel Moore. It looked as if Carmel's case was going to be won on PORNBIO#1 but someone has just joined the debate arguing for GNG deletion on the grounds that IAFD and BGAFD are unreliable sources. This person is an Administrator and unless he has stepped completely out of his comfort zone, needs to be tackled. I have responded in the best way I can. Perhaps you can add something of relevance?Graemp (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but given our previous discussion above I prefer to stay out of the discussion for now, as you could be accused of WP:CANVASS and my opinion would be invalidated as well. Cavarrone 23:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Understand. I withdraw my earlier interest in all future Finnegas things. Graemp (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Italian films
Merry CHristmas! Can you add you films to the lists like Italian films of 1972 though? It makes it much better for browsing that way! Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know you have, but I checked the 1972 list and didn't see the film there! If it was your intention to add soon my apologies! Even if just listing the film there and not filling the tables out is helpful! Sometime I must go through the imdb lists like this by year and flesh out each list like I did to the 50s and 60s a while back!♦ Dr. Blofeld

Thanks for your list expansions! I've just added an imdb direct link to here. Tomorrow I'll go through them all and add the links, should make it easier to add the films then! French films of the 1930s if my first port of call though..♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah it is hard work adding over a 100 films to a list and filling in but it can all be done gradually. I'm already amazed with how much work you've done as it is ad it's great to see you've been steadily building new articles with nice posters and cast over the past few years. Keep up the grreat work anyway!! I'll fix all of the links to imdb tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you add the poster for Maschio latino cercasi? Google image seems to be picking up an alternative name.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah I guessed it was terrible. Argentina and Spain had the same problem with generic shoddy sex comedies in the 70s!! in fact so did the UK! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Links are now all in place, just click to retrieve film. IN looking pre 1940, especially silent era is extremely poor, if you could add say 5 films from the top of each imdb list from 1910 onwards this would at least be a start! Post 2000 is also surprisingly underdeveloped and we're only up to 2011! I'll definitely help you out, although France I've been meaning to concentrate most on. Linking the year to the list like Maschio latino cercasi I think it really helpful, I'm can't remember whether you did that or not! Dr. Blofeld 13:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

30s Italian cinema really not any good? France produced some wonderful films during that period, Renoir especially. 40s Italian cinema like Bicycle Thieves etc seemed rather good, although I'm sure each era had its good and bad films.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Have you seen Amarcord? What do you think about that system of linking to the year list where it says 1973?♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah it was intended more as a what did you think of Amarcord, it would be sort of like asking me if I'd seen Jurassic Park or something LOL. I love Amarcord, batshit insane and crazy at times, but a masterpiece nonetheless. What do you think of Novecento? I saw it a few weeks back and oddly found compelling to watch even at 5 hours 17 minutes! Only after the first 90 minutes and towards the end did I get tired! I thought it was a great film, but could have done with some editing in parts. on the link front, can you let me know who was deleting the links and I'll have a word with them. Please do continue with the links, it makes it much more convenient.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

It's definitely worth watching, the De Niro-Depardieu bed scene LOL. Donald Sutherland was really evil in it! I thought it was great, but the ending was like 40-50 minutes when it only needed to be 10. Other that that it didn't seem unnecessarily long throughout but I think it could have been easily cut to 4 hours without affecting the quality. I watched it all in one go, but I'm an experienced film buff who is used to film marathons! Part of my reason for wanting to build these film lists is to broaden my knowledge and open up new films to be aware of. Problem for me is subtitles though and most of the films if I can get hold of them won't be in English and I only understand Spanish at an intermediate level! I'd love to learn Italian fluently sometime...♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Just added Guida to the 70s in Sex symbol! If you know of any other Italian ones and can cite a source which states it feel free to add more to any decade, female or male. It's heavily US/UK oriented at the moment!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

It seems some guideline like WP:BACON AND EGGS WITH PANCAKES AND MAPLE SYRUP is being cited as the reason why it shouldn't be linked which looks like a warped interpretation to me. Common sense would dictate but a lot of editors here are devoid of it unfortunately. It seems linking it in a See also List of Italian films of 1973 is preferred..♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

It "violates" WP:EGG apparently, even though it says elsewhere that you can link something if it has some useful link purpose. They contradict each other. I really detest editors who go about the website branding WP:xx at everybody as if they're anything other than rules a handful of people invented as a basic guidelines. Certain people on here are really irritating me at the moment, dealing with pettiness and rule merchants mainly. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you do me a favour and upload the film poster for Ashes and Diamonds (film)?♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Giovanni Fontana
Hi, this draft article about Italian poet Giovanni Fontana is about to be deleted as the cites are not properly formatted and it has not been improved for over six months. His body of work seems significant. There is an Italian WP article on him. He has won major national prizes and therefore, for this reason alone, would meet the keep criteria, if they were properly sourced. There is some literary coverage of his work. There is a notable architect and a viola player of the same name. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Span (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for creating the stub. I think it's fine to add the works listing in. Span (talk) 13:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Feel free to add them. I avoided to do it just because the most important works were already included in the text of the biography. Cavarrone 15:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The House of 1,000 Dolls
Hi, can you upload and get rid of the photo? For some reason I can't save photos online at the moment, the whirl thing on firefox comes up.♦ Dr. Blofeld  23:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Lorenzo Pareto article review
A quick thanks to you, user Cavarrone, for your review of the Lorenzo Pareto article. YOurs, Wikiuser100 (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

All are not experts
All people are not experts. We learn from our mistakes. So if I add a delete tag that doesn't mean that you as an expert and experienced Wikipedian should add a "Nonsense" word while reverting it rather than informing me my mistakes. This behavior is really uncalled. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

If you refrained from placing speedy deletion tags on articles which are clearly encyclopedic and not candidates then you wouldn't be treated like an idiot. These articles have long been requested on here and are linked in numerous missing lists. To start them and then see somebody trying to delete it within minutes, that is uncalled for. Obviously you're intelligent with your computer degree, so act like it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well I understand everything and already apologized for that. I appreciate your help regarding my edits and kind words. Nobody is perfect and yes I'll never treat you as an idiot if you just make a single mistake. Thank you and I think I may need your help in future regarding Wikipedia edits. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

The Hunter Factor
A pleasure. Looks like he's in the midst of writing an autobiography! http://eastofelmgrove.wordpress.com/2012/06/02/spaghetti/ Foofbun (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link, Foofbun... I absolutely love the title,  Memoirs of a Spaghetti Cowboy! I will buy it for sure. I own several films with him, especially Death Walks in Laredo is one of my favorite guilty pleasures. --Cavarrone 21:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

http://wconnolly.blogspot.com.au/2009/03/thomas-hunter-on-death-walks-in-laredo.html Foofbun (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Lucky man! I've never seen any of his Westerns.  I had no idea the film was shot in Algeria!

Marzullo - Televenezia - Body Guards - Guardie del corpo
Do you have some photo for :
 * Body Guards - Guardie del corpo film
 * Luigi Marzullo journalist
 * Televenezia--Lglukgl (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Claudia Cardinale
I've begun expanding this. It would be great if you could help me on it and find some Italian language newspaper reviews and details etc, or access the biographies on her. I think it's a worthy one, I'm going to bring it up to GA status.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I own many monographic books about Italian actors (Vittorio Gassman, Nino Manfredi, Totò, Marcello Mastroianni, Ugo Tognazzi, Paolo Villaggio, Franco Franchi and Ciccio Ingrassia among others) but a very few about actresses and noone specifical about Cardinale. I will check a couple of books about Italian cinema to see if there is something whorty to be included. Cavarrone 16:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah OK. Yikes that's a beast of an article on Italian wiki. I may need help translating and proofing that one!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Probably best I do the translation in stage. Can you check the early life and the first part of 1950s in the Claudia Cardinale article checking against User:Dr. Blofeld/Claudia Cardinale. Shouldn't take long just a quick scan to see I've done the translation OK and haven't missed anything important.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Cheers, thanks. I think I'll lay the bones out for the 70s and 80s next and then continue with 1959 and the 1960s translation. One thing though can you double check the quote which Cardinale says about feel trapped by the "plan" drawn up for her life, I had to remove a few words, I'm not sure it's translated exactly which it ought to be as a quote.

"non ero più padrona né del mio corpo né dei miei pensieri. Persino a un'amica era rischioso raccontare qualcosa che prendesse le distanze dalla mia immagine pubblica, perché poteva essere divulgato, mettendomi nei guai. Tutto era in mano alla Vides" ♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Second one looks right. Thanks. I knew there was something slightly different about it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Marcello Mastroianni is a shocker of an article in terms of coverage!! Considering that he's one of the most-high profile Italian actors in cinematic history!! Would you be interested in expanding it with me sometime? If you have biographies etc this would be great!! Anyway, Cardinale to GA first.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Nino Manfredi is even worse, that's a real shocker!! Maybe that one then would be priority. Thanks for uploading those images! I have a feeling though that the commons will try to delete them on grounds that they qualify as artwork (from a film) which has to be 70 years though.♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Really?? I uploaded a lot of images of GBU and the Dollars films a while back and they all got deleted. I'm guessing it was because they were United Artists screenshots. Is there a way around that? I'd love to get Leone's films up to GA status sometime.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Was a long time ago in wiki history really, maybe 2009 or 2010 or something. All I know is that I uploaded a lot of good images to the commons or on here from Italian wikipedia under the same license and somebody deleted them all claiming something "just because they're PD in Italy doesn't mean they are in the US too", that's pretty much why I haven't uploaded any for Italian cinema aside from fair use posters since.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Having trouble with Fellini's quote "una Cardinale che io mi ricorderò per un pezzo. Quegli occhi che guardano con gli angoli accanto al naso, quei capelli bruni lunghi e spettinati (...) quel viso di cerva, di gatta, e così passionalmente perduta nella tragedia".♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Yeah it seemed a difficult one. I get what he's trying to say, I'll partly paraphrase it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again. Can't make sense of this either. I gather it's something about her being a feminine ideal or falling in love with Cardinale.

Nei film di Bolognini, la Cardinale incarna la figura della donna come perdizione per l'uomo, la mantide religiosa, grazie alla sua grande femminilità estetica. In effetti, durante le riprese del primo di questi, Il bell'Antonio, la star della Dolce vita Marcello Mastroianni si innamora di lei che, pur attratta dal suo fascino gentile, lo respinge, perché non lo prende sul serio e lo considera uno di quegli attori che non possono fare a meno di innamorarsi delle loro compagne di lavoro. Mastroianni, anche a distanza di molti anni, le rinfaccerà di non aver creduto all'autenticità dei suoi sentimenti. Malgrado il dispiacere di Bolognini per la situazione, l'atmosfera di tensione tra i due interpreti si rivela ideale per trasmettere quella fra i personaggi del film. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Nice one. I've uploaded, but it might be the wrong license. Can you take care of it? Will continue on the article tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  23:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

See, File:Claudia Cardinale pose.jpg is already up for deletion. Can you save it? I simply copied the license which was on the previous Cardinale image. Perhaps the Italian one would stick?♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps could be uploaded to replace the current signed one. Although the details for that didn't look great either.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Forbidden Forest
Hi. I've restored the notability tag to Forbidden Forest (film). I believe you were in error in removing it. The page has at best one reliable source, this Dominion website, which is some kind of "reader-funded and member-run" grassroots media coop. Fair enough, but as you know notability requires multiple WP:RS. Nor does it seem to meet any of the other criteria at WP:NOTFILM. I'm not going to nominate it for deletion, but I can't see how this page can be said to have clearly established notability -- and I've made a concerted and unsuccessful attempt to find more reliable sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

tempo
purtroppo ho poco tempo per dedicarmi al progetto, comunque ho inserito tutte le fonti, da te segnalate nelle discussioni di quell'utente cancellatore, in Buccellati e Morellato Group: se vuoi, puoi riordinarle e integrarle nei relativi articoli, che sono solo abbozzati quindi da sviluppare. Congratulazioni per la tua capacità di ricerca su libri e internet. Ciao e alla prossima--Puccetto (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

ho letto il tuo intervento riguardo Breil ma quello che proprio non capisco è il criterio logico di taluni amministratori: in Articles for deletion/Hanowa posso constatare che la matematica è un punto di vista perchè la maggioranza, incluso l'autore della voce, è favorevole all'unione del testo con altro articolo. Probabilmente io sono lento a capire, ma tu hai capito perchè Hanowa resta e Breil no? Per Hanowa due utenti hanno votato la cancellazione e quattro per unione-reindirizzo, me compreso, quindi dovevano fare per Hanowa esattamente quello che invece han fatto a Breil. Considero questo progetto tutto tranne che un'enciclopedia dunque non m'impressiona l'ignoranza degli amministratori ma io son certo che qui c'è del marcio! Collaboro per mero passatempo ma forse dovrò trovare un modo migliore d'impiegare le mie ore in biblioteca: questo sito sembra una presa per i fondelli!--Puccetto (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Mass Is Ended.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Mass Is Ended.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Logo and Photo (Italian television)
Hello Cavarrone do you have some photo or logos about these??: --Lglukgl (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Un ciclone in famiglia(this page was bad now it is a stub but i don't have a photo)
 * Linea Gialla
 * Fabio Ravezzani
 * Antenna 3
 * Telenuovo

--Lglukgl (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC) + --Lglukgl (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * TG La7
 * Il processo di Biscardi
 * Qui studio a voi stadio
 * Omnibus (talk show)
 * Natale sul Nilo
 * L'Infedele
 * Le Invasioni Barbariche

Barnaul Cartridge Plant
What constitutes "blatant copyvio"? Why did you erase ~4300 bytes of text from Barnaul Cartridge Plant? At least you could leave the "History" section and write a short one-sentence paraphrase of the history of the Barnaul plant without just erase the whole thing. Do you think that is a good way to edit an article -- erasing entire sections without doing anything else? I'm not a troll. I'm asking legit questions. Petesimon2 (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Copyright violations. --Cavarrone 11:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:What We Do in the Shadows.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:What We Do in the Shadows.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

….
Hello, about this diff. You are probably right and the ones who get confused (see TP and p. hist. like I said) can XXXXX. Indeed why be helpful and try to distinguish when those two persons are not even the same? They just have the same supercommon surname (I have 22 friends named Haze) in the same field during the same years. You are probably right, nothing in common that I can see, totally different. Even wonder why two people put that hatnote there. Keep up the good work.--36.55.207.203 (talk) 08:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Jouette Herlin listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jouette Herlin. Since you had some involvement with the Jouette Herlin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 16:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Οι Μάγισσες listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Οι Μάγισσες. Since you had some involvement with the Οι Μάγισσες redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 22:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)